ADVERSE REACTIONS SECTION.

6 ADVERSE REACTIONS. The following clinically significant adverse reactions are also discussed in other sections of the labeling:oPeripheral Neuropathy [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1)]oHypotension [see Warnings and Precautions(5.2)]oCardiac Toxicity [see Warnings and Precautions(5.3)]oPulmonary Toxicity [see Warnings and Precautions(5.4)]oPosterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES) [see Warnings and Precautions (5.5 )]oGastrointestinal Toxicity [see Warnings and Precautions(5.6)]oThrombocytopenia/Neutropenia [see Warnings and Precautions(5.7)]oTumor Lysis Syndrome [see Warnings and Precautions (5.8)]oHepatic Toxicity [see Warnings and Precautions(5.9)]oThrombotic Microangiopathy [see Warnings and Precautions (5.10)]. oPeripheral Neuropathy [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1)]. oHypotension [see Warnings and Precautions(5.2)]. oCardiac Toxicity [see Warnings and Precautions(5.3)]. oPulmonary Toxicity [see Warnings and Precautions(5.4)]. oPosterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES) [see Warnings and Precautions (5.5 )]. oGastrointestinal Toxicity [see Warnings and Precautions(5.6)]. oThrombocytopenia/Neutropenia [see Warnings and Precautions(5.7)]. oTumor Lysis Syndrome [see Warnings and Precautions (5.8)]. oHepatic Toxicity [see Warnings and Precautions(5.9)]. oThrombotic Microangiopathy [see Warnings and Precautions (5.10)]. Most commonly reported adverse reactions (incidence >=20%) in clinical studies include nausea, diarrhea, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, peripheral neuropathy, fatigue, neuralgia, anemia, leukopenia, constipation, vomiting, lymphopenia, rash, pyrexia, and anorexia. (6.1)To report SUSPECTED ADVERSE REACTIONS, contact Sandoz Inc. at 1-800-525-8747 or FDA at 1-800-FDA-1088 or www.fda.gov/medwatch.. 6.1 Clinical Trials Experience. Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in clinical practice.Summary of Clinical Trial in Patients with Previously Untreated Multiple MyelomaTable describes safety data from 340 patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma who received bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2) administered intravenously in combination with melphalan (9 mg/m2) and prednisone (60 mg/m2) in prospective randomized study.The safety profile of bortezomib in combination with melphalan/prednisone is consistent with the known safety profiles of both bortezomib and melphalan/prednisone. Table 9: Most Commonly Reported Adverse Reactions (>=10% in the Bortezomib, Melphalan and Prednisone Arm) with Grades and >=4 Intensity in the Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma StudyBody SystemAdverse ReactionBortezomib, Melphalan and PrednisoneMelphalan and Prednisone(n=340)(n=337)TotalToxicity Grade, (%)TotalToxicity Grade, (%)n (%)3>=4n (%)3>=4Blood and Lymphatic System Disorders Thrombocytopenia164 (48)60 (18)57 (17)140 (42)48 (14)39 (12) Neutropenia160 (47)101 (30)33 (10)143 (42)77 (23)42 (12) Anemia109 (32)41 (12)4 (1)156 (46)61 (18)18 (5) Leukopenia108 (32)64 (19)8 (2)93 (28)53 (16)11 (3) Lymphopenia78 (23)46 (14)17 (5)51 (15)26 (8)7 (2)Gastrointestinal Disorders Nausea134 (39)10 (3)070 (21)1 (<1)0 Diarrhea119 (35)19 (6)2 (1)20 (6)1 (<1)0 Vomiting87 (26)13 (4)041 (12)2 (1)0 Constipation77 (23)2 (1)014 (4)00 Abdominal Pain Upper34 (10)1 (<1)020 (6)00Nervous System Disorders Peripheral NeuropathyRepresents High Level Term Peripheral Neuropathies NEC 156 (46)42 (12)2 (1)4 (1)00 Neuralgia117 (34)27 (8)2 (1)1 (<1)00 Paresthesia42 (12)6 (2)04 (1)00General Disorders and Administration Site Conditions Fatigue85 (25)19 (6)2 (1)48 (14)4 (1)0 Asthenia54 (16)18 (5)023 (7)3 (1)0 Pyrexia53 (16)4 (1)019 (6)1 (<1)1 (<1)Infections and Infestations Herpes Zoster39 (11)11 (3)09 (3)4 (1)0Metabolism and Nutrition Disorders Anorexia64 (19)6 (2)019 (6)00Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders Rash38 (11)2 (1)07 (2)00Psychiatric Disorders Insomnia35 (10)1 (<1)021 (6)00Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Randomized Study of Bortezomib vs DexamethasoneThe safety data described below and in Table 10 reflect exposure to either bortezomib (n=331) or dexamethasone (n=332) in study of patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. Bortezomib was administered intravenously at doses of 1.3 mg/m2 twice weekly for two out of three weeks (21 day cycle). After eight, 21 day cycles patients continued therapy for three, 35 day cycles on weekly schedule. Duration of treatment was up to 11 cycles (nine months) with median duration of six cycles (4.1 months). For inclusion in the trial, patients must have had measurable disease and one to three prior therapies. There was no upper age limit for entry. Creatinine clearance could be as low as 20 mL/min and bilirubin levels as high as 1.5 times the upper limit of normal. The overall frequency of adverse reactions was similar in men and women, and in patients <65 and >=65 years of age. Most patients were Caucasian [see Clinical Studies (14.1)]. Among the 331 bortezomib treated patients, the most commonly reported (>20%) adverse reactions overall were nausea (52%), diarrhea (52%), fatigue (39%), peripheral neuropathies (35%), thrombocytopenia (33%), constipation (30%), vomiting (29%), and anorexia (21%). The most commonly reported (>20%) adverse reaction reported among the 332 patients in the dexamethasone group was fatigue (25%). Eight percent (8%) of patients in the bortezomib treated arm experienced Grade adverse reaction; the most common reactions were thrombocytopenia (4%) and neutropenia (2%). Nine percent (9%) of dexamethasone-treated patients experienced Grade adverse reaction. All individual dexamethasone-related Grade adverse reactions were less than 1%. Serious Adverse Reactions and Adverse Reactions Leading to Treatment Discontinuation in the Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Study of Bortezomib vs DexamethasoneSerious adverse reactions are defined as any reaction that results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongs current hospitalization, results in significant disability, or is deemed to be an important medical event. total of 80 (24%) patients from the bortezomib treatment arm experienced serious adverse reaction during the study, as did 83 (25%) dexamethasone-treated patients. The most commonly reported serious adverse reactions in the bortezomib treatment arm were diarrhea (3%), dehydration, herpes zoster, pyrexia, nausea, vomiting, dyspnea, and thrombocytopenia (2% each). In the dexamethasone treatment group, the most commonly reported serious adverse reactions were pneumonia (4%), hyperglycemia (3%), pyrexia, and psychotic disorder (2% each).A total of 145 patients, including 84 (25%) of 331 patients in the bortezomib treatment group and 61 (18%) of 332 patients in the dexamethasone treatment group were discontinued from treatment due to adverse reactions. Among the 331 bortezomib treated patients, the most commonly reported adverse reaction leading to discontinuation was peripheral neuropathy (8%). Among the 332 patients in the dexamethasone group, the most commonly reported adverse reactions leading to treatment discontinuation were psychotic disorder and hyperglycemia (2% each).Four deaths were considered to be bortezomib-related in this relapsed multiple myeloma study: one case each of cardiogenic shock, respiratory insufficiency, congestive heart failure and cardiac arrest. Four deaths were considered dexamethasone-related: two cases of sepsis, one case of bacterial meningitis, and one case of sudden death at home.Most Commonly Reported Adverse Reactions in the Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Study of Bortezomib vs DexamethasoneThe most common adverse reactions from the relapsed multiple myeloma study are shown in Table 10. All adverse reactions with incidence >=10% in the bortezomib arm are included. Table 10: Most Commonly Reported Adverse Reactions (>=10% in Bortezomib Arm) with Grades and Intensity in the Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Study of Bortezomib vs Dexamethasone (N=663) Adverse ReactionsBortezomib (N=331)Dexamethasone (N=332)AllGrade 3Grade 4AllGrade 3Grade 4Any Adverse Reactions324 (98)193 (58)28 (8)297 (89)110 (33)29 (9)Nausea172 (52)8 (2)031 (9)00Diarrhea NOS171 (52)22 (7)036 (11)2 (<1)0Fatigue130 (39)15 (5)082 (25)8 (2)0Peripheral neuropathies115 (35)23 (7)2 (<1)14 (4)01 (<1)Thrombocytopenia109 (33)80 (24)12 (4)11 (3)5 (2)1 (<1)Constipation99 (30)6 (2)027 (8)1 (<1)0Vomiting NOS96 (29)8 (2)010 (3)1 (<1)0Anorexia68 (21)8 (2)08 (2)1 (<1)0Pyrexia 66 (20)2 (<1)021 (6)3 (<1)1 (<1)Paresthesia64 (19)5 (2)024 (7)00Anemia NOS63 (19)20 (6)1 (<1)21 (6)8 (2)0Headache NOS62 (19)3 (<1)023 (7)1 (<1)0Neutropenia58 (18)37 (11)8 (2)1 (<1)1 (<1)0Rash NOS43 (13)3 (<1)07 (2)00Appetite Decreased NOS36 (11)0012 (4)00Dyspnea NOS35 (11)11 (3)1 (<1)37 (11)7 (2)1 (<1)Abdominal Pain NOS35 (11)5 (2)07 (2)00Weakness34 (10)10 (3)028 (8)8 (2)0Represents High Level Term Peripheral Neuropathies NECSafety Experience from the Phase Open-Label Extension Study in Relapsed Multiple MyelomaIn the Phase extension study of 63 patients, no new cumulative or new long-term toxicities were observed with prolonged bortezomib treatment. These patients were treated for total of 5.3 to 23 months, including time on bortezomib in the prior bortezomib study [see Clinical Studies (14.1)]. Safety Experience from the Phase Open-Label Study of Bortezomib Subcutaneous vs Intravenous in Relapsed Multiple MyelomaThe safety and efficacy of bortezomib administered subcutaneously were evaluated in one Phase study at the recommended dose of 1.3 mg/m2. This was randomized, comparative study of bortezomib subcutaneous vs intravenous in 222 patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. The safety data described below and in Table 11 reflect exposure to either bortezomib subcutaneous (N=147) or bortezomib intravenous (N=74) [see Clinical Studies (14.1)]. Table 11: Most Commonly Reported Adverse Reactions (>=10%), with Grade and >=4 Intensity in the Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Study (N=221) of Bortezomib Subcutaneous vs Intravenous Subcutaneous(N=147)Intravenous(N=74)Body SystemTotalToxicity Grade, (%)TotalToxicity Grade, (%)Adverse Reactionn (%)3>=4n (%)3>=4Blood and Lymphatic System Disorders Anemia28 (19)8 (5)017 (23)3 (4)0 Leukopenia26 (18)8 (5)015 (20)4 (5)1 (1) Neutropenia34 (23)15 (10)4 (3)20 (27)10 (14)3 (4) Thrombocytopenia44 (30)7 (5)5 (3)25 (34)7 (9)5 (7)Gastrointestinal Disorders Diarrhea28 (19)1 (1)021 (28)3 (4)0 Nausea24 (16)0010 (14)00 Vomiting13 (9)3 (2)08 (11)00General Disorders and Administration Site Conditions Asthenia10 (7)1 (1)012 (16)4 (5)0 Fatigue11 (7)3 (2)011 (15)3 (4)0 Pyrexia18 (12)006 (8)00Nervous System Disorders Neuralgia34 (23)5 (3)017 (23)7 (9)0 Peripheral neuropathies55 (37)8 (5)1 (1)37 (50)10 (14)1 (1)Note: Safety population: 147 patients in the subcutaneous treatment group and 74 patients in the intravenous treatment group who received at least one dose of study medication Represents High Level Term Peripheral Neuropathies NECIn general, safety data were similar for the subcutaneous and intravenous treatment groups. Differences were observed in the rates of some Grade >=3 adverse reactions. Differences of >=5% were reported in neuralgia (3% subcutaneous vs 9% intravenous), peripheral neuropathies (6% subcutaneous vs 15% intravenous), neutropenia (13% subcutaneous vs 18% intravenous), and thrombocytopenia (8% subcutaneous vs 16% intravenous).A local reaction was reported in 6% of patients in the subcutaneous group, mostly redness. Only two (1%) patients were reported as having severe reactions, one case of pruritus and one case of redness. Local reactions led to reduction in injection concentration in one patient and drug discontinuation in one patient. Local reactions resolved in median of six days.Dose reductions occurred due to adverse reactions in 31% of patients in the subcutaneous treatment group compared with 43% of the intravenously-treated patients. The most common adverse reactions leading to dose reduction included peripheral sensory neuropathy (17% in the subcutaneous treatment group compared with 31% in the intravenous treatment group); and neuralgia (11% in the subcutaneous treatment group compared with 19% in the intravenous treatment group). Serious Adverse Reactions and Adverse Reactions Leading to Treatment Discontinuation in the Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Study of Bortezomib Subcutaneous vs IntravenousThe incidence of serious adverse reactions was similar for the subcutaneous treatment group (20%) and the intravenous treatment group (19%). The most commonly reported serious adverse reactions in the subcutaneous treatment arm were pneumonia and pyrexia (2% each). In the intravenous treatment group, the most commonly reported serious adverse reactions were pneumonia, diarrhea, and peripheral sensory neuropathy (3% each).In the subcutaneous treatment group, 27 patients (18%) discontinued study treatment due to an adverse reaction compared with 17 patients (23%) in the intravenous treatment group. Among the 147 subcutaneously-treated patients, the most commonly reported adverse reactions leading to discontinuation were peripheral sensory neuropathy (5%) and neuralgia (5%). Among the 74 patients in the intravenous treatment group, the most commonly reported adverse reactions leading to treatment discontinuation were peripheral sensory neuropathy (9%) and neuralgia (9%).Two patients (1%) in the subcutaneous treatment group and one (1%) patient in the intravenous treatment group died due to an adverse reaction during treatment. In the subcutaneous group the causes of death were one case of pneumonia and one case of sudden death. In the intravenous group the cause of death was coronary artery insufficiency.Safety Experience from the Clinical Trial in Patients with Previously Untreated Mantle Cell LymphomaTable 12 describes safety data from 240 patients with previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma who received bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2) administered intravenously in combination with rituximab (375 mg/m2), cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m2), doxorubicin (50 mg/m2), and prednisone (100 mg/m2) (VcR-CAP) in prospective randomized study. Infections were reported for 31% of patients in the VcR-CAP arm and 23% of the patients in the comparator (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone [R-CHOP]) arm, including the predominant preferred term of pneumonia (VcR-CAP 8% vs R-CHOP 5%). Table 12: Most Commonly Reported Adverse Reactions (>=5%) with Grades and >=4 Intensity in the Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma StudyTable 12: Most Commonly Reported Adverse Reactions (>=5%) with Grades and >=4 Intensity in the Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma StudyVcR-CAP (n=240)R-CHOP (n=242)Body System Adverse ReactionsAll (%)Toxicity Grade n (%)Toxicity Grade >=4 (%) All (%)Toxicity Grade n (%)Toxicity Grade >=4 (%) Key: R-CHOP=rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone;VcR-CAP=bortezomib, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone.Blood and Lymphatic System DisordersNeutropenia209 (87)32 (13)168 (70)172 (71)31 (13)125 (52)Leukopenia116 (48)34 (14)69 (29)87 (36)39 (16)27 (11)Anemia106 (44)27 (11)4 (2)71 (29)23 (10)4 (2)Thrombocytopenia172 (72)59 (25)76 (32)42 (17)9 (4)3 (1)Febrile neutropenia41 (17)24 (10)12 (5)33 (14)17 (7)15 (6)Lymphopenia68 (28)25 (10)36 (15)28 (12)15 (6)2 (1)Nervous System DisordersPeripheral neuropathyRepresents High Level Term Peripheral Neuropathies NEC 71 (30)17 (7)1 (<1)65 (27)10 (4)0Hypoesthesia14 (6)3 (1)013 (5)00Paresthesia14 (6)2 (1)011 (5)00Neuralgia25 (10)9 (4)01 (< 1)00General Disorders and Administration Site ConditionsFatigue43 (18)11 (5)1 (<1)38 (16)5 (2)0Pyrexia48 (20)7 (3)023 (10)5 (2)0Asthenia29 (12)4 (2)1 (<1)18 (7)1 (<1)0Edema peripheral16 (7)1 (<1)013 (5)00Gastrointestinal DisordersNausea54 (23)1 (<1)028 (12)00Constipation42 (18)1 (<1)022 (9)2 (1)0Stomatitis20 (8)2 (1)019 (8)01 (<1)Diarrhea59 (25)11 (5)011 (5)3 (1)1 (<1)Vomiting24 (10)1 (<1)08 (3)00Abdominal distension13 (5)004 (2)00Infections and InfestationsPneumonia20 (8)8 (3)5 (2)11 (5)5 (2)3 (1)Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue DisordersAlopecia31 (13)1 (<1)1 (<1)33 (14)4 (2)0Metabolism and Nutrition DisordersHyperglycemia10 (4)1 (<1)017 (7)10 (4)0Decreased appetite36 (15)2 (1)015 (6)1 (<1)0Vascular DisordersHypertension15 (6)1 (<1)03 (1)00Psychiatric DisordersInsomnia16 (7)1 (<1)08 (3)00The incidence of herpes zoster reactivation was 4.6% in the VcR-CAP arm and 0.8% in the R-CHOP arm. Antiviral prophylaxis was mandated by protocol amendment.The incidences of Grade >=3 bleeding events were similar between the two arms (four patients in the VcR-CAP arm and three patients in the R-CHOP arm). All of the Grade >=3 bleeding events resolved without sequelae in the VcR-CAP arm. Adverse reactions leading to discontinuation occurred in 8% of patients in VcR-CAP group and 6% of patients in R-CHOP group. In the VcR-CAP group, the most commonly reported adverse reaction leading to discontinuation was peripheral sensory neuropathy (1%; three patients). The most commonly reported adverse reaction leading to discontinuation in the R-CHOP group was febrile neutropenia (<1%; two patients).Integrated Summary of Safety (Relapsed Multiple Myeloma and Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma)Safety data from Phase and studies of single agent bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2/dose twice weekly for two weeks followed by ten day rest period in 1,163 patients with previously-treated multiple myeloma (N=1,008) and previously-treated mantle cell lymphoma (N=155) were integrated and tabulated. This analysis does not include data from the Phase open-label study of bortezomib subcutaneous vs intravenous in relapsed multiple myeloma. In the integrated studies, the safety profile of bortezomib was similar in patients with multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma.In the integrated analysis, the most commonly reported (>20%) adverse reactions were nausea (49%), diarrhea (46%), asthenic conditions including fatigue (41%) and weakness (11%), peripheral neuropathies (38%), thrombocytopenia (32%), vomiting (28%), constipation (25%), and pyrexia (21%). Eleven percent (11%) of patients experienced at least one episode of >=Grade toxicity, most commonly thrombocytopenia (4%) and neutropenia (2%).In the Phase relapsed multiple myeloma clinical trials of bortezomib administered intravenously, local skin irritation was reported in 5% of patients, but extravasation of bortezomib was not associated with tissue damage.Serious Adverse Reactions and Adverse Reactions Leading to Treatment Discontinuation in the Integrated Summary of SafetyA total of 26% of patients experienced serious adverse reaction during the studies. The most commonly reported serious adverse reactions included diarrhea, vomiting and pyrexia (3% each), nausea, dehydration, and thrombocytopenia (2% each) and pneumonia, dyspnea, peripheral neuropathies, and herpes zoster (1% each).Adverse reactions leading to discontinuation occurred in 22% of patients. The reasons for discontinuation included peripheral neuropathy (8%), and fatigue, thrombocytopenia, and diarrhea (2% each).In total, 2% of the patients died and the cause of death was considered by the investigator to be possibly related to study drug: including reports of cardiac arrest, congestive heart failure, respiratory failure, renal failure, pneumonia and sepsis.Most Commonly Reported Adverse Reactions in the Integrated Summary of SafetyThe most common adverse reactions are shown in Table 13. All adverse reactions occurring at >=10% are included. In the absence of randomized comparator arm, it is often not possible to distinguish between adverse events that are drug-caused and those that reflect the patients underlying disease. Please see the discussion of specific adverse reactions that follows. Table 13: Most Commonly Reported (>=10% Overall) Adverse Reactions in Integrated Analyses of Relapsed Multiple Myeloma and Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma Studies Using the 1.3 mg/m2 Dose (N=1163) Adverse Reactions All Patients(N=1,163) Multiple Myeloma(N=1,008) Mantle Cell Lymphoma(N=155) All >=Grade All >=Grade All >=Grade Nausea 567 (49) 36 (3) 511 (51) 32 (3) 56 (36) (3) Diarrhea NOS 530 (46) 83 (7) 470 (47) 72 (7) 60 (39) 11 (7) Fatigue 477 (41) 86 (7) 396 (39) 71 (7) 81 (52) 15 (10) Peripheral neuropathies 443 (38) 129 (11) 359 (36) 110 (11) 84 (54) 19 (12) Thrombocytopenia 369 (32) 295 (25) 344 (34) 283 (28) 25 (16) 12 (8) Vomiting NOS 321 (28) 44 (4) 286 (28) 40 (4) 35 (23) (3) Constipation 296 (25) 17 (1) 244 (24) 14 (1) 52 (34) (2) Pyrexia 249 (21) 16 (1) 233 (23) 15 (1) 16 (10) (<1) Anorexia 227 (20) 19 (2) 205 (20) 16 (2) 22 (14) (2) Anemia NOS 209 (18) 65 (6) 190 (19) 63 (6) 19 (12) (1) Headache NOS 175 (15) (<1) 160 (16) (<1) 15 (10) Neutropenia 172 (15) 121 (10) 164 (16) 117 (12) (5) (3) Rash NOS 156 (13) (<1) 120 (12) (<1) 36 (23) (3) Paresthesia 147 (13) (<1) 136 (13) (<1) 11 (7) (<1) Dizziness (excl vertigo) 129 (11) 13 (1) 101 (10) (<1) 28 (18) (3) Weakness 124 (11) 31 (3) 106 (11) 28 (3) 18 (12) (2) Represents High Level Term Peripheral Neuropathies NECDescription of Selected Adverse Reactions from the Integrated Phase and Relapsed Multiple Myeloma and Phase Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma Studies Gastrointestinal ToxicityA total of 75% of patients experienced at least one gastrointestinal disorder. The most common gastrointestinal disorders included nausea, diarrhea, constipation, vomiting, and appetite decreased. Other gastrointestinal disorders included dyspepsia and dysgeusia. Grade adverse reactions occurred in 14% of patients; >=Grade adverse reactions were <=1%. Gastrointestinal adverse reactions were considered serious in 7% of patients. Four percent (4%) of patients discontinued due to gastrointestinal adverse reaction. Nausea was reported more often in patients with multiple myeloma (51%) compared to patients with mantle cell lymphoma (36%).ThrombocytopeniaAcross the studies, bortezomib-associated thrombocytopenia was characterized by decrease in platelet count during the dosing period (Days to 11) and return toward baseline during the ten day rest period during each treatment cycle. Overall, thrombocytopenia was reported in 32% of patients. Thrombocytopenia was Grade in 22%, >=Grade in 4%, and serious in 2% of patients, and the reaction resulted in bortezomib discontinuation in 2% of patients [see Warnings and Precautions 5.7)]. Thrombocytopenia was reported more often in patients with multiple myeloma (34%) compared to patients with mantle cell lymphoma (16%). The incidence of >=Grade thrombocytopenia also was higher in patients with multiple myeloma (28%) compared to patients with mantle cell lymphoma (8%).Peripheral NeuropathyOverall, peripheral neuropathies occurred in 38% of patients. Peripheral neuropathy was Grade for 11% of patients and >=Grade for <1% of patients. Eight percent (8%) of patients discontinued bortezomib due to peripheral neuropathy. The incidence of peripheral neuropathy was higher among patients with mantle cell lymphoma (54%) compared to patients with multiple myeloma (36%).In the bortezomib vs dexamethasone Phase relapsed multiple myeloma study, among the 62 bortezomib-treated patients who experienced >=Grade peripheral neuropathy and had dose adjustments, 48% had improved or resolved with median of 3.8 months from first onset.In the Phase relapsed multiple myeloma studies, among the 30 patients who experienced Grade peripheral neuropathy resulting in discontinuation or who experienced >=Grade peripheral neuropathy, 73% reported improvement or resolution with median time of 47 days to improvement of one grade or more from the last dose of bortezomib.HypotensionThe incidence of hypotension (postural, orthostatic and hypotension NOS) was 8% in patients treated with bortezomib. Hypotension was Grade or in the majority of patients and Grade in 2% and >=Grade in <1%. Two percent (2%) of patients had hypotension reported as serious adverse reaction, and 1% discontinued due to hypotension. The incidence of hypotension was similar in patients with multiple myeloma (8%) and those with mantle cell lymphoma (9%). In addition, <1% of patients experienced hypotension associated with syncopal reaction.NeutropeniaNeutrophil counts decreased during the bortezomib dosing period (Days to 11) and returned toward baseline during the ten day rest period during each treatment cycle. Overall, neutropenia occurred in 15% of patients and was Grade in 8% of patients and >=Grade in 2%. Neutropenia was reported as serious adverse reaction in <1% of patients and <1% of patients discontinued due to neutropenia. The incidence of neutropenia was higher in patients with multiple myeloma (16%) compared to patients with mantle cell lymphoma (5%). The incidence of >=Grade neutropenia also was higher in patients with multiple myeloma (12%) compared to patients with mantle cell lymphoma (3%).Asthenic Conditions (Fatigue, Malaise, Weakness, Asthenia)Asthenic conditions were reported in 54% of patients. Fatigue was reported as Grade in 7% and >=Grade in <1% of patients. Asthenia was reported as Grade in 2% and >=Grade in <1% of patients. Two percent (2%) of patients discontinued treatment due to fatigue and <1% due to weakness and asthenia. Asthenic conditions were reported in 53% of patients with multiple myeloma and 59% of patients with mantle cell lymphoma.Pyrexia Pyrexia (>38C) was reported as an adverse reaction for 21% of patients. The reaction was Grade in 1% and >=Grade in <1%. Pyrexia was reported as serious adverse reaction in 3% of patients and led to bortezomib discontinuation in <1% of patients. The incidence of pyrexia was higher among patients with multiple myeloma (23%) compared to patients with mantle cell lymphoma (10%). The incidence of >=Grade pyrexia was 1% in patients with multiple myeloma and <1% in patients with mantle cell lymphoma.Herpes Virus InfectionConsider using antiviral prophylaxis in subjects being treated with bortezomib. In the randomized studies in previously untreated and relapsed multiple myeloma, herpes zoster reactivation was more common in subjects treated with bortezomib (ranging between to 11%) than in the control groups (3 to 4%). Herpes simplex was seen in to 3% in subjects treated with bortezomib and to 3% in the control groups. In the previously untreated multiple myeloma study, herpes zoster virus reactivation in the bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone arm was less common in subjects receiving prophylactic antiviral therapy (3%) than in subjects who did not receive prophylactic antiviral therapy (17%).Retreatment in Relapsed Multiple MyelomaA single-arm trial was conducted in 130 patients with relapsed multiple myeloma to determine the efficacy and safety of retreatment with intravenous bortezomib. The safety profile of patients in this trial is consistent with the known safety profile of bortezomib-treated patients with relapsed multiple myeloma as demonstrated in Tables 10, 11, and 13; no cumulative toxicities were observed upon retreatment. The most common adverse drug reaction was thrombocytopenia which occurred in 52% of the patients. The incidence of >=Grade thrombocytopenia was 24%. Peripheral neuropathy occurred in 28% of patients, with the incidence of >=Grade peripheral neuropathy reported at 6%. The incidence of serious adverse reactions was 12.3%. The most commonly reported serious adverse reactions were thrombocytopenia (3.8%), diarrhea (2.3%), and herpes zoster and pneumonia (1.5% each). Adverse reactions leading to discontinuation occurred in 13% of patients. The reasons for discontinuation included peripheral neuropathy (5%) and diarrhea (3%). Two deaths considered to be bortezomib-related occurred within 30 days of the last bortezomib dose; one in patient with cerebrovascular accident and one in patient with sepsis.Additional Adverse Reactions from Clinical StudiesThe following clinically important serious adverse reactions that are not described above have been reported in clinical trials in patients treated with bortezomib administered as monotherapy or in combination with other chemotherapeutics. These studies were conducted in patients with hematological malignancies and in solid tumors.Blood and Lymphatic System Disorders:Anemia, disseminated intravascular coagulation, febrile neutropenia, lymphopenia, leukopenia Cardiac Disorders:Angina pectoris, atrial fibrillation aggravated, atrial flutter, bradycardia, sinus arrest, cardiac amyloidosis, complete atrioventricular block, myocardial ischemia, myocardial infarction, pericarditis, pericardial effusion, Torsades de pointes, ventricular tachycardiaEar and Labyrinth Disorders:Hearing impaired, vertigoEye Disorders:Diplopia and blurred vision, conjunctival infection, irritationGastrointestinal Disorders:Abdominal pain, ascites, dysphagia, fecal impaction, gastroenteritis, gastritis hemorrhagic, hematemesis, hemorrhagic duodenitis, ileus paralytic, large intestinal obstruction, paralytic intestinal obstruction, peritonitis, small intestinal obstruction, large intestinal perforation, stomatitis, melena, pancreatitis acute, oral mucosal petechiae, gastroesophageal refluxGeneral Disorders and Administration Site Conditions:Chills, edema, edema peripheral, injection site erythema, neuralgia, injection site pain, irritation, malaise, phlebitisHepatobiliary Disorders:Cholestasis, hepatic hemorrhage, hyperbilirubinemia, portal vein thrombosis, hepatitis, liver failureImmune System Disorders:Anaphylactic reaction, drug hypersensitivity, immune complex mediated hypersensitivity, angioedema, laryngeal edemaInfections and Infestations:Aspergillosis, bacteremia, bronchitis, urinary tract infection, herpes viral infection, listeriosis, nasopharyngitis, pneumonia, respiratory tract infection, septic shock, toxoplasmosis, oral candidiasis, sinusitis, catheter-related infectionInjury, Poisoning and Procedural Complications:Catheter-related complication, skeletal fracture, subdural hematomaInvestigations:Weight decreasedMetabolism and Nutrition Disorders:Dehydration, hypocalcemia, hyperuricemia, hypokalemia, hyperkalemia, hyponatremia, hypernatremiaMusculoskeletal and Connective Tissue Disorders:Arthralgia, back pain, bone pain, myalgia, pain in extremityNervous System Disorders:Ataxia, coma, dizziness, dysarthria, dysesthesia, dysautonomia, encephalopathy, cranial palsy, grand mal convulsion, headache, hemorrhagic stroke, motor dysfunction, neuralgia, spinal cord compression, paralysis, postherpetic neuralgia, transient ischemic attack Psychiatric Disorders:Agitation, anxiety, confusion, insomnia, mental status change, psychotic disorder, suicidal ideationRenal and Urinary Disorders:Calculus renal, bilateral hydronephrosis, bladder spasm, hematuria, hemorrhagic cystitis, urinary incontinence, urinary retention, renal failure (acute and chronic), glomerular nephritis proliferativeRespiratory, Thoracic and Mediastinal Disorders:Acute respiratory distress syndrome, aspiration pneumonia, atelectasis, chronic obstructive airways disease exacerbated, cough, dysphagia, dyspnea, dyspnea exertional, epistaxis, hemoptysis, hypoxia, lung infiltration, pleural effusion, pneumonitis, respiratory distress, pulmonary hypertensionSkin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders:Urticaria, face edema, rash (which may be pruritic), leukocytoclastic vasculitis, pruritusVascular Disorders:Cerebrovascular accident, cerebral hemorrhage, deep venous thrombosis, hypertension, peripheral embolism, pulmonary embolism, pulmonary hypertension. Table 9: Most Commonly Reported Adverse Reactions (>=10% in the Bortezomib, Melphalan and Prednisone Arm) with Grades and >=4 Intensity in the Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma Study. Table 10: Most Commonly Reported Adverse Reactions (>=10% in Bortezomib Arm) with Grades and Intensity in the Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Study of Bortezomib vs Dexamethasone (N=663) Table 11: Most Commonly Reported Adverse Reactions (>=10%), with Grade and >=4 Intensity in the Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Study (N=221) of Bortezomib Subcutaneous vs Intravenous Table 12: Most Commonly Reported Adverse Reactions (>=5%) with Grades and >=4 Intensity in the Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma Study. Table 13: Most Commonly Reported (>=10% Overall) Adverse Reactions in Integrated Analyses of Relapsed Multiple Myeloma and Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma Studies Using the 1.3 mg/m2 Dose (N=1163). Adverse Reactions. All Patients(N=1,163). Multiple Myeloma(N=1,008). Mantle Cell Lymphoma(N=155). All. >=Grade 3. All. >=Grade 3. All. >=Grade 3. Nausea. 567 (49). 36 (3). 511 (51). 32 (3). 56 (36). (3). Diarrhea NOS. 530 (46). 83 (7). 470 (47). 72 (7). 60 (39). 11 (7). Fatigue. 477 (41). 86 (7). 396 (39). 71 (7). 81 (52). 15 (10). Peripheral neuropathies. 443 (38). 129 (11). 359 (36). 110 (11). 84 (54). 19 (12). Thrombocytopenia. 369 (32). 295 (25). 344 (34). 283 (28). 25 (16). 12 (8). Vomiting NOS. 321 (28). 44 (4). 286 (28). 40 (4). 35 (23). (3). Constipation. 296 (25). 17 (1). 244 (24). 14 (1). 52 (34). (2). Pyrexia. 249 (21). 16 (1). 233 (23). 15 (1). 16 (10). (<1). Anorexia. 227 (20). 19 (2). 205 (20). 16 (2). 22 (14). (2). Anemia NOS. 209 (18). 65 (6). 190 (19). 63 (6). 19 (12). (1). Headache NOS. 175 (15). (<1). 160 (16). (<1). 15 (10). 0. Neutropenia. 172 (15). 121 (10). 164 (16). 117 (12). (5). (3). Rash NOS. 156 (13). (<1). 120 (12). (<1). 36 (23). (3). Paresthesia. 147 (13). (<1). 136 (13). (<1). 11 (7). (<1). Dizziness (excl vertigo). 129 (11). 13 (1). 101 (10). (<1). 28 (18). (3). Weakness. 124 (11). 31 (3). 106 (11). 28 (3). 18 (12). (2). Represents High Level Term Peripheral Neuropathies NEC. 6.2 Postmarketing Experience. The following adverse reactions have been identified from the worldwide postmarketing experience with bortezomib. Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish causal relationship to drug exposure:Cardiac Disorders: Cardiac tamponadeEar and Labyrinth Disorders: Deafness bilateralEye Disorders: Optic neuropathy, blindness, chalazion/blepharitisGastrointestinal Disorders: Ischemic colitisInfections and Infestations: Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), ophthalmic herpes, herpes meningoencephalitisNervous System Disorders: Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES, formerly RPLS), Guillain-Barre syndrome, demyelinating polyneuropathyRespiratory, Thoracic and Mediastinal Disorders: Acute diffuse infiltrative pulmonary diseaseSkin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders: Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN), acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis (Sweets syndrome).

CLINICAL STUDIES SECTION.

14 CLINICAL STUDIES. 14.1 Multiple Myeloma. Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Study in Patients with Previously Untreated Multiple MyelomaA prospective, international, randomized (1:1), open-label clinical study (NCT00111319) of 682 patients was conducted to determine whether bortezomib administered intravenously (1.3 mg/m2) in combination with melphalan (9 mg/m2) and prednisone (60 mg/m2) resulted in improvement in time to progression (TTP) when compared to melphalan (9 mg/m2) and prednisone (60 mg/m2) in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma. Treatment was administered for maximum of nine cycles (approximately 54 weeks) and was discontinued early for disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Antiviral prophylaxis was recommended for patients on the bortezomib study arm.The median age of the patients in the study was 71 years (48;91), 50% were male, 88% were Caucasian and the median Karnofsky performance status score for the patients was 80 (60;100). Patients had IgG/IgA/Light chain myeloma in 63%/25%/8% instances, median hemoglobin of 105 g/L (64;165), and median platelet count of 221,500 /microliter (33,000;587,000).Efficacy results for the trial are presented in Table 14. At prespecified interim analysis (with median follow-up of 16.3 months), the combination of bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone therapy resulted in significantly superior results for time to progression, progression-free survival, overall survival and response rate. Further enrollment was halted, and patients receiving melphalan and prednisone were offered bortezomib in addition. later, prespecified analysis of overall survival (with median follow-up of 36.7 months with hazard ratio of 0.65, 95% CI: 0.51, 0.84) resulted in statistically significant survival benefit for the bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone treatment arm despite subsequent therapies including bortezomib based regimens. In an updated analysis of overall survival based on 387 deaths (median follow-up 60.1 months), the median overall survival for the bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone treatment arm was 56.4 months and for the melphalan and prednisone treatment arm was 43.1 months, with hazard ratio of 0.695 (95% CI: 0.57, 0.85).Table 14: Summary of Efficacy Analyses in the Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma StudyEfficacy EndpointBortezomib, Melphalan and Prednisone(n=344)Melphalan and Prednisone(n=338)Time to ProgressionNote: All results are based on the analysis performed at median follow-up duration of 16.3 months except for the overall survival analysis.Events (%)101 (29)152 (45)MedianKaplan-Meier estimate (months)(95% CI)20.7(17.6, 24.7)15(14.1, 17.9)Hazard ratioHazard ratio estimate is based on Cox proportional-hazard model adjusted for stratification factors: beta2-microglobulin, albumin, and region. hazard ratio less than one indicates an advantage for bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone (95% CI)0.54(0.42, 0.70)p-value p-value based on the stratified log-rank test adjusted for stratification factors: beta2-microglobulin, albumin, and region 0.000002Progression-free Survival Events (%)135 (39)190 (56)Median (months)(95% CI)18.3(16.6, 21.7)14(11.1, 15)Hazard ratio (95% CI)0.61(0.49, 0.76)p-value 0.00001Response RateCREBMT criteria (%)102 (30)12 (4)PR (%)136 (40)103 (30)nCR (%)5 (1)0CR PR (%)238 (69)115 (34)p-valuep-value for Response Rate (CR PR) from the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test adjusted for the stratification factors <10-10 Overall Survival at Median Follow Up of 36.7 MonthsEvents (deaths) (%)109 (32)148 (44)Median (months)(95% CI)Not Reached(46.2, NR)43.1(34.8, NR)Hazard ratio (95% CI)0.65(0.51, 0.84)p-value 0.00084TTP was statistically significantly longer on the bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone arm (see Figure 1). (median follow-up 16.3 months). Overall survival was statistically significantly longer on the bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone arm (see Figure 2). (median follow-up 60.1 months)Figure 2: Overall SurvivalBortezomib, Melphalan and Prednisone vs Melphalan and PrednisoneRandomized, Clinical Study in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma of Bortezomib vs DexamethasoneA prospective Phase 3, international, randomized (1:1), stratified, open-label clinical study (NCT00048230) enrolling 669 patients was designed to determine whether bortezomib resulted in improvement in time to progression (TTP) compared to high-dose dexamethasone in patients with progressive multiple myeloma following to prior therapies. Patients considered to be refractory to prior high-dose dexamethasone were excluded as were those with baseline Grade >=2 peripheral neuropathy or platelet counts <50,000/uL. total of 627 patients were evaluable for response.Stratification factors were based on the number of lines of prior therapy the patient had previously received (one previous line vs more than one line of therapy), time of progression relative to prior treatment (progression during or within six months of stopping their most recent therapy vs relapse >6 months after receiving their most recent therapy), and screening beta2-microglobulin levels (<=2.5 mg/L vs >2.5 mg/L).Baseline patient and disease characteristics are summarized in Table 15.Table 15: Summary of Baseline Patient and Disease Characteristics in the Relapsed Multiple Myeloma StudyPatient CharacteristicsBortezomib(N=333)Dexamethasone(N=336)Median age in years (range)62 (33, 84)61 (27, 86)Gender: Male/female56% 44%60% 40%Race: Caucasian/black/other90% 6% 4%88% 7% 5%Karnofsky performance status score <=7013%17%Hemoglobin <100 g/L32%28%Platelet count <75 109/L6%4%Disease CharacteristicsType of myeloma (%): IgG/IgA/Light chain60% 23% 12%59% 24% 13%Median beta2-microglobulin (mg/L)3.73.6Median albumin (g/L)3939Creatinine clearance <=30 mL/min [n (%)]17 (5%)11 (3%)Median Duration of Multiple Myeloma Since Diagnosis (Years)3.53.1Number of Prior Therapeutic Lines of TreatmentMedian221 prior line40%35%>1 prior line60%65%Previous TherapyAny prior steroids, e.g., dexamethasone, VAD98%99%Any prior anthracyclines, e.g., VAD, mitoxantrone77%76%Any prior alkylating agents, e.g., MP, VBMCP91%92%Any prior thalidomide therapy48%50%Vinca alkaloids74%72%Prior stem cell transplant/other high-dose therapy67%68%Prior experimental or other types of therapy3%2%Patients in the bortezomib treatment group were to receive 8, three week treatment cycles followed by 3, five week treatment cycles of bortezomib. Patients achieving CR were treated for four cycles beyond first evidence of CR. Within each three week treatment cycle, bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2/dose alone was administered by intravenous bolus twice weekly for two weeks on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 followed by ten day rest period (Days 12 to 21). Within each five week treatment cycle, bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2/dose alone was administered by intravenous bolus once weekly for four weeks on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 followed by 13 day rest period (Days 23 to 35) [see Dosage and Administration (2.2)]. Patients in the dexamethasone treatment group were to receive 4, five week treatment cycles followed by 5, four week treatment cycles. Within each five week treatment cycle, dexamethasone 40 mg/day PO was administered once daily on Days to 4, to 12, and 17 to 20 followed by 15 day rest period (Days 21 to 35). Within each four week treatment cycle, dexamethasone 40 mg/day PO was administered once daily on Days to followed by 24 day rest period (Days to 28). Patients with documented progressive disease on dexamethasone were offered bortezomib at standard dose and schedule on companion study. Following preplanned interim analysis of time to progression, the dexamethasone arm was halted and all patients randomized to dexamethasone were offered bortezomib, regardless of disease status.In the bortezomib arm, 34% of patients received at least one bortezomib dose in all eight of the three week cycles of therapy, and 13% received at least one dose in all 11 cycles. The average number of bortezomib doses during the study was 22, with range of to 44. In the dexamethasone arm, 40% of patients received at least one dose in all four of the five week treatment cycles of therapy, and 6% received at least one dose in all nine cycles.The time to event analyses and response rates from the relapsed multiple myeloma study are presented in Table 16. Response and progression were assessed using the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria. Complete response (CR) required <5% plasma cells in the marrow, 100% reduction in M-protein, and negative immunofixation test (IF-). Partial response (PR) requires >=50% reduction in serum myeloma protein and >=90% reduction of urine myeloma protein on at least two occasions for minimum of at least six weeks along with stable bone disease and normal calcium. Near complete response (nCR) was defined as meeting all the criteria for complete response including 100% reduction in M-protein by protein electrophoresis; however, M-protein was still detectable by immunofixation (IF+).Table 16: Summary of Efficacy Analyses in the Relapsed Multiple Myeloma StudyEfficacy EndpointAll Patients1 Prior Line of Therapy> Prior Line of TherapyBortezomibDexBortezomibDexBortezomibDex(n=333)(n=336)(n=132)(n=119)(n=200)(n=217)Time to ProgressionEvents (%)147 (44)196 (58)55 (42)64 (54)92 (46)132 (61)Median Kaplan-Meier estimate (95% CI)6.2 mo(4.9, 6.9)3.5 mo(2.9, 4.2)7 mo(6.2, 8.8)5.6 mo(3.4, 6.3)4.9 mo(4.2, 6.3)2.9 mo(2.8, 3.5)Hazard ratio Hazard ratio is based on Cox proportional-hazard model with the treatment as single independent variable. hazard ratio less than one indicates an advantage for bortezomib (95% CI)0.55(0.44, 0.69)0.55(0.38, 0.81)0.54(0.41, 0.72)p-value p-value based on the stratified log-rank test including randomization stratification factors <0.00010.0019<0.0001Overall SurvivalEvents (deaths) (%)51 (15)84 (25)12 (9)24 (20)39 (20)60 (28)Hazard ratio (95% CI)0.57(0.40, 0.81)0.39(0.19, 0.81)0.65(0.43, 0.97)p-value Precise p-value cannot be rendered <0.05<0.05<0.05Response RatePopulation Response population includes patients who had measurable disease at baseline and received at least one dose of study drug = 627n=315n=312n=128n=110n=187n=202CR EBMT criteria; nCR meets all EBMT criteria for CR but has positive IF. Under EBMT criteria nCR is in the PR category (%)20 (6)2 (<1)8 (6)2 (2)12 (6)0 (0)PR n(%)101 (32)54 (17)49 (38)27 (25)52 (28)27 (13)nCR In two patients, the IF was unknown n(%)21 (7)3 (<1)8 (6)2 (2)13 (7)1 (<1)CR PR (%)121 (38)56 (18)57 (45)29 (26)64 (34)27 (13)p-value p-value for Response Rate (CR PR) from the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test adjusted for the stratification factors <0.00010.0035<0.0001TTP was statistically significantly longer on the bortezomib arm (see Figure 3).As shown in Figure 4, bortezomib had significant survival advantage relative to dexamethasone (p<0.05). The median follow-up was 8.3 months.For the 121 patients achieving response (CR or PR) on the bortezomib arm, the median duration was months (95% CI: 6.9, 11.5 months) compared to 5.6 months (95% CI: 4.8, 9.2 months) for the 56 responders on the dexamethasone arm. The response rate was significantly higher on the bortezomib arm regardless of beta2-microglobulin levels at baseline.Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Study of BortezomibSubcutaneous vs Intravenous in Relapsed Multiple MyelomaAn open-label, randomized, Phase noninferiority study (NCT00722566) compared the efficacy and safety of the subcutaneous administration of bortezomib vs the intravenous administration. This study included 222 bortezomib naive patients with relapsed multiple myeloma, who were randomized in 2:1 ratio to receive 1.3 mg/m2 of bortezomib by either the subcutaneous (n=148) or intravenous (n=74) route for eight cycles. Patients who did not obtain an optimal response (less than Complete Response (CR)) to therapy with bortezomib alone after four cycles were allowed to receive oral dexamethasone 20 mg daily on the day of and after bortezomib administration (82 patients in subcutaneous treatment group and 39 patients in the intravenous treatment group). Patients with baseline Grade >=2 peripheral neuropathy or neuropathic pain, or platelet counts <50,000/uL were excluded. total of 218 patients were evaluable for response.Stratification factors were based on the number of lines of prior therapy the patient had received (one previous line vs more than one line of therapy), and international staging system (ISS) stage (incorporating beta2-microglobulin and albumin levels; Stages I, II, or III).The baseline demographic and other characteristics of the two treatment groups are summarized as follows: the median age of the patient population was approximately 64 years of age (range: 38 to 88 years), primarily male (subcutaneous: 50%, intravenous: 64%); the primary type of myeloma is IgG (subcutaneous: 65% IgG, 26% IgA, 8% light chain; intravenous: 72% IgG, 19% IgA, 8% light chain), ISS staging I/II/III (%) was 27, 41, 32 for both subcutaneous and intravenous, Karnofsky performance status score was <=70% in 22% of subcutaneous and 16% of intravenous, creatinine clearance was 67.5 mL/min in subcutaneous and 73 mL/min in intravenous, the median years from diagnosis was 2.68 and 2.93 in subcutaneous and intravenous respectively and the proportion of patients with more than one prior line of therapy was 38% in subcutaneous and 35% in intravenous.This study met its primary (noninferiority) objective that single agent subcutaneous bortezomib retains at least 60% of the overall response rate after four cycles relative to single agent intravenous bortezomib. The results are provided in Table 17. Table 17: Summary of Efficacy Analyses in the Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Study of Bortezomib Subcutaneous vs IntravenousTable 17: Summary of Efficacy Analyses in the Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Study of Bortezomib Subcutaneous vs IntravenousSubcutaneous BortezomibIntravenous BortezomibIntent to Treat Population(n=148)(n=74)Primary EndpointResponse Rate at CyclesORR (CR+PR) n(%)63 (43)31 (42)Ratio of Response Rates (95% CI)1.01 (0.73, 1.40)CR (%)11 (7)6 (8)PR (%)52 (35)25 (34)nCR (%)9 (6)4 (5)Secondary EndpointsResponse Rate at CyclesORR (CR+PR)78 (53)38 (51)CR (%)17 (11)9 (12)PR (%)61 (41)29 (39)nCR (%)14 (9)7 (9)Median Time to Progression, months10.49.4Median Progression Free Survival, months10.28.01 year Overall Survival (%)Median duration of follow up is 11.8 months72.676.7A Randomized Phase Dose-Response Study in Relapsed Multiple MyelomaAn open-label, multicenter study randomized 54 patients with multiple myeloma who had progressed or relapsed on or after front-line therapy to receive bortezomib mg/m2 or 1.3 mg/m2 intravenous bolus twice weekly for two weeks on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 followed by ten day rest period (Days 12 to 21). The median duration of time between diagnosis of multiple myeloma and first dose of bortezomib on this trial was two years, and patients had received median of one prior line of treatment (median of three prior therapies). single complete response was seen at each dose. The overall response rates (CR PR) were 30% (8/27) at mg/m2 and 38% (10/26) at 1.3 mg/m2.A Phase Open-Label Extension Study in Relapsed Multiple MyelomaPatients from the two Phase studies, who in the investigators opinion would experience additional clinical benefit, continued to receive bortezomib beyond cycles on an extension study. Sixty-three (63) patients from the Phase multiple myeloma studies were enrolled and received median of seven additional cycles of bortezomib therapy for total median of 14 cycles (range: to 32). The overall median dosing intensity was the same in both the parent protocol and extension study. Sixty-seven percent (67%) of patients initiated the extension study at the same or higher dose intensity at which they completed the parent protocol, and 89% of patients maintained the standard three week dosing schedule during the extension study. No new cumulative or new long-term toxicities were observed with prolonged bortezomib treatment [see Adverse Reactions (6.1)]. Single-Arm Trial of Retreatment in Relapsed Multiple MyelomaA single-arm, open-label trial (NCT00431769) was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of retreatment with bortezomib. One hundred and thirty patients (>=18 years of age) with multiple myeloma who previously had at least partial response on bortezomib-containing regimen (median of two prior lines of therapy [range: to 7]) were retreated upon progression with bortezomib administered intravenously. Patients were excluded from trial participation if they had peripheral neuropathy or neuropathic pain of Grade >=2. At least six months after prior bortezomib therapy, bortezomib was restarted at the last tolerated dose of 1.3 mg/m2 (n=93) or <=1 mg/m2 (n=37) and given on Days 1, 4, and 11 every three weeks for maximum of eight cycles either as single agent or in combination with dexamethasone in accordance with the standard of care. Dexamethasone was administered in combination with bortezomib to 83 patients in Cycle with an additional 11 patients receiving dexamethasone during the course of bortezomib retreatment cycles.The primary endpoint was best confirmed response to retreatment as assessed by European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria. Fifty of the 130 patients achieved best confirmed response of Partial Response or better for an overall response rate of 38.5% (95% CI: 30.1, 47.4). One patient achieved Complete Response and 49 achieved Partial Response. In the 50 responding patients, the median duration of response was 6.5 months and the range was 0.6 to 19.3 months.. Table 17: Summary of Efficacy Analyses in the Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Study of Bortezomib Subcutaneous vs Intravenous. Fig2. Fig 3. Fig 4. Figure 1. 14.2 Mantle Cell Lymphoma. Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Study in Patients with Previously Untreated Mantle Cell LymphomaA randomized, open-label, Phase study (NCT00722137) was conducted in 487 adult patients with previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma (Stage II, III or IV) who were ineligible or not considered for bone marrow transplantation to determine whether bortezomib administered in combination with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (VcR-CAP) resulted in improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) when compared to the combination of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP). This clinical study utilized independent pathology confirmation and independent radiologic response assessment.Patients in the VcR-CAP treatment arm received bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2) administered intravenously on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 (rest period Days 12 to 21); rituximab (375 mg/m2) on Day 1; cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m2) on Day 1; doxorubicin (50 mg/m2) on Day 1; and prednisone (100 mg/m2) on Day through Day of the 21 day treatment cycle. For patients with response first documented at Cycle 6, two additional treatment cycles were allowed.Median patient age was 66 years, 74% were male, 66% were Caucasian and 32% were Asian. Sixty-nine percent of patients had positive bone marrow aspirate and/or positive bone marrow biopsy for MCL, 54% of patients had an International Prognostic Index (IPI) score of three (high-intermediate) or higher and 76% had Stage IV disease. The majority of the patients in both groups received six or more cycles of treatment, 84% in the VcR-CAP group and 83% in the R-CHOP group. Median number of cycles received by patients in both treatment arms was six with 17% of patients in the R-CHOP group and 14% of subjects in the VcR-CAP group receiving up to two additional cycles.The efficacy results for PFS, CR and ORR with median follow-up of 40 months are presented in Table 18. The response criteria used to assess efficacy were based on the International Workshop to Standardize Response Criteria for Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma (IWRC). Final overall survival results at median follow-up of 78.5 months are also presented in Table 18 and Figure 6. The combination of VcR-CAP resulted in statistically significant prolongation of PFS compared with R-CHOP (see Table 18, Figure 5). Table 18: Summary of Efficacy Analyses in the Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma Study Efficacy Endpoint n: Intent to Treat patientsVcR-CAP (n=243)R-CHOP (n=244)Note: All results are based on the analysis performed at median follow-up duration of 40 months except for the overall survival analysis, which was performed at median follow-up of 78.5 months.CI=Confidence Interval; IPI= International Prognostic Index; LDH=Lactate dehydrogenaseProgression-free Survival (by independent radiographic assessment)Events (%)133 (55)165 (68)MedianBased on Kaplan-Meier product limit estimates. (months)2514(95% CI)(20, 32)(12, 17)Hazard ratioHazard ratio estimate is based on Coxs model stratified by IPI risk and stage of disease. hazard ratio 1 indicates an advantage for VcR-CAP. 0.63(95% CI)(0.50, 0.79)p-valueBased on Log rank test stratified with IPI risk and stage of disease. <0.001Complete Response Rate (CR)Includes CR by independent radiographic assessment, bone marrow, and LDH using ITT population. (%)108 (44)82 (34)(95% CI)(38, 51)(28, 40)Overall Response Rate (CR+CRu+PR)Includes CR+ CRu+PR by independent radiographic assessment, regardless of the verification by bone marrow and LDH, using ITT population.n (%)214 (88)208 (85)(95% CI)(83, 92)(80, 89)Overall SurvivalEvents n(%)103 (42)138 (57)Median (months)(95% CI)91(71, NE)56(47, 69)Hazard Ratio (95% CI)0.66(0.51, 0.85)Figure 5: Progression-Free Survival VcR-CAP vs R-CHOP (previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma Study)Key: R-CHOP=rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone; VcR-CAP=Bortezomib, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone.Figure 6: Overall Survival VcR-CAP vs R-CHOP (previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma Study)Key: R-CHOP=rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone; VcR-CAP=Bortezomib, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone.A Phase Single-Arm Clinical Study in Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma after Prior TherapyThe safety and efficacy of bortezomib in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma were evaluated in an open-label, single-arm, multicenter study (NCT00063713) of 155 patients with progressive disease who had received at least one prior therapy. The median age of the patients was 65 years (42, 89), 81% were male, and 92% were Caucasian. Of the total, 75% had one or more extra-nodal sites of disease, and 77% were Stage 4. In 91% of the patients, prior therapy included all of the following: an anthracycline or mitoxantrone, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab. total of thirty-seven percent (37%) of patients were refractory to their last prior therapy. An intravenous bolus injection of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2/dose was administered twice weekly for two weeks on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 followed by ten day rest period (Days 12 to 21) for maximum of 17 treatment cycles. Patients achieving CR or CRu were treated for four cycles beyond first evidence of CR or CRu. The study employed dose modifications for toxicity [see Dosage and Administration (2.6), (2.7)].Responses to bortezomib are shown in Table 19. Response rates to bortezomib were determined according to the International Workshop Response Criteria (IWRC) based on independent radiologic review of CT scans. The median number of cycles administered across all patients was four; in responding patients the median number of cycles was eight. The median time to response was 40 days (range: 31 to 204 days). The median duration of follow-up was more than 13 months.Table 19: Response Outcomes in Phase Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma Study Response Analyses (N 155) (%)95% CIOverall Response Rate (IWRC) (CR CRu PR)48 (31)(24, 39)Complete Response (CR CRu) 12 (8)(4, 13)CR10 (6)(3, 12)CRu2 (1)(0, 5)Partial Response (PR)36 (23)(17, 31)Duration of ResponseMedian95% CICR CRu PR (N 48)9.3 months(5.4, 13.8)CR CRu (N 12)15.4 months(13.4, 15.4)PR (N=36)6.1 months(4.2, 9.3). Figure 5. Fig-6.

DOSAGE & ADMINISTRATION SECTION.

2 DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION. oFor subcutaneous or intravenous use only. Each route of administration has different reconstituted concentration. Exercise caution when calculating the volume to be administered. (2.1, 2.10)oThe recommended starting dose of bortezomib is 1.3 mg/m2 administered either as 3 to second bolus intravenous injection or subcutaneous injection. (2.2, 2.4, 2.6)oRetreatment for Multiple Myeloma: May retreat starting at the last tolerated dose. (2.6)oHepatic Impairment: Use lower starting dose for patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment. (2.8)oDose must be individualized to prevent overdose. (2.10). oFor subcutaneous or intravenous use only. Each route of administration has different reconstituted concentration. Exercise caution when calculating the volume to be administered. (2.1, 2.10). oThe recommended starting dose of bortezomib is 1.3 mg/m2 administered either as 3 to second bolus intravenous injection or subcutaneous injection. (2.2, 2.4, 2.6). oRetreatment for Multiple Myeloma: May retreat starting at the last tolerated dose. (2.6). oHepatic Impairment: Use lower starting dose for patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment. (2.8). oDose must be individualized to prevent overdose. (2.10). 2.1 Important Dosing Guidelines Bortezomib for injection is for intravenous or subcutaneous use only. Do not administer bortezomib for injection by any other route.Because each route of administration has different reconstituted concentration, use caution when calculating the volume to be administered.The recommended starting dose of bortezomib for injection is 1.3 mg/m2. Bortezomib for injection is administered intravenously at concentration of mg/mL, or subcutaneously at concentration of 2.5 mg/mL [see Dosage and Administration 2.10)]. Bortezomib for injection retreatment may be considered for patients with multiple myeloma who had previously responded to treatment with bortezomib for injection and who have relapsed at least six months after completing prior bortezomib for injection treatment. Treatment may be started at the last tolerated dose [see Dosage and Administration 2.6)]. When administered intravenously, administer bortezomib for injection as 3 to second bolus intravenous injection.. 2.2 Dosage in Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma. Bortezomib for injection is administered in combination with oral melphalan and oral prednisone for 9, six-week treatment cycles as shown in Table 1. In Cycles to 4, bortezomib for injection is administered twice weekly (Days 1, 4, 8, 11, 22, 25, 29 and 32). In Cycles to 9, bortezomib for injection is administered once weekly (Days 1, 8, 22 and 29). At least 72 hours should elapse between consecutive doses of bortezomib for injection.Table 1: Dosage Regimen for Patients with Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma Twice Weekly Bortezomib (Cycles to 4)Week123456Bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2)Day1- -- -Day4Day8Day11restperiodDay22Day25Day29Day32restperiodMelphalan (9 mg/m2) Prednisone (60 mg/m2) Day1Day2Day3Day4- -- -rest period- -- -- -- -restperiodOnce Weekly Bortezomib (Cycles to when used in combination with Melphalan and Prednisone)Week123456Bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2)Day1- -- Day8 restperiodDay22 Day29 restperiodMelphalan (9 mg/m2) Prednisone (60 mg/m2) Day1Day2Day3Day4- -- -restperiod- -- -- -- -restperiod. 2.3 Dose Modification Guidelines for Bortezomib for Injection When Given in Combination with Melphalan and Prednisone. Prior to initiating any cycle of therapy with bortezomib for injection in combination with melphalan and prednisone:oPlatelet count should be at least 70 109/L and the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) should be at least x 109/LoNonhematological toxicities should have resolved to Grade or baselineTable 2: Dose Modifications During Cycles of Combination Bortezomib, Melphalan and Prednisone TherapyToxicityDose Modification or DelayHematological toxicity during cycle:If prolonged Grade neutropenia or thrombocytopenia, or thrombocytopenia with bleeding is observed in the previous cycle Consider reduction of the melphalan dose by 25% in the next cycleIf platelet count is not above 30 109/L or ANC is not above 0.75 109/L on bortezomib dosing day (other than Day 1)Withhold bortezomib dose If several bortezomib doses in consecutive cycles are withheld due to toxicityReduce bortezomib dose by one dose level (from 1.3 mg/m2 to mg/m2, or from mg/m2 to 0.7 mg/m2)Grade or higher nonhematological toxicitiesWithhold bortezomib therapy until symptoms of toxicity have resolved to Grade or baseline. Then, bortezomib may be reinitiated with one dose level reduction (from 1.3 mg/m2 to mg/m2, or from mg/m2 to 0.7 mg/m2). For bortezomib-related neuropathic pain and/or peripheral neuropathy, hold or modify bortezomib as outlined in Table 5.For information concerning melphalan and prednisone, see manufacturers prescribing information.Dose modifications guidelines for peripheral neuropathy are provided [see Dosage and Administration (2.7)]. oPlatelet count should be at least 70 109/L and the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) should be at least x 109/L. oNonhematological toxicities should have resolved to Grade or baseline. 2.4 Dosage in Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma. Bortezomib for injection (1.3 mg/m2) is administered intravenously in combination with intravenous rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and oral prednisone (VcR-CAP) for 6, three week treatment cycles as shown in Table 3. Bortezomib is administered first followed by rituximab. Bortezomib for injection is administered twice weekly for two weeks (Days 1, 4, 8, and 11) followed by ten day rest period on Days 12 to 21. For patients with response first documented at Cycle 6, two additional VcR-CAP cycles are recommended. At least 72 hours should elapse between consecutive doses of bortezomib for injection.Table 3: Dosage Regimen for Patients with Previously Untreated Mantle Cell LymphomaTwice Weekly Bortezomib (6, Three-Week Cycles)Dosing may continue for two more cycles (for total of eight cycles) if response is first seen at Cycle 6.Week123Bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2)Day 1----Day 4--Day 8Day 11rest periodRituximab (375 mg/m2) Cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m2) Doxorubicin (50 mg/m2)Day 1--------rest periodPrednisone (100 mg/m2)Day 1Day 2Day 3Day 4Day 5----rest period. 2.5 Dose Modification Guidelines for Bortezomib for Injection When Given in Combination with Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin and Prednisone. Prior to the first day of each cycle (other than Cycle 1):oPlatelet count should be at least 100 109/L and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) should be at least 1.5 109/LoHemoglobin should be at least g/dL (at least 4.96 mmol/L)oNonhematologic toxicity should have recovered to Grade or baselineInterrupt bortezomib treatment at the onset of any Grade hematologic or nonhematological toxicities, excluding neuropathy [see Table 5, Warnings and Precautions (5)]. For dose adjustments, see Table below.Table 4: Dose Modifications on Days 4, 8, and 11 During Cycles of Combination Bortezomib, Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin and Prednisone TherapyToxicityDose modification or delayHematological ToxicityoGrade or higher neutropenia, or platelet count not at or above 25 109/LWithhold bortezomib therapy for up to weeks until the patient has an ANC at or above 0.75 109/L and platelet count at or above 25 109/L. oIf, after bortezomib for injection has been withheld, the toxicity does not resolve, discontinue bortezomib for injection.oIf toxicity resolves such that the patient has an ANC at or above 0.75 109/L and platelet count at or above 25 109/L, bortezomib for injection dose should be reduced by dose level (from 1.3 mg/m2 to mg/m2, or from mg/m2 to 0.7 mg/m2).Grade or higher nonhematological toxicitiesWithhold bortezomib therapy until symptoms of the toxicity have resolved to Grade or better. Then, bortezomib for injection may be reinitiated with one dose level reduction (from 1.3 mg/m2 to mg/m2, or from mg/m2 to 0.7 mg/m2). For bortezomib-related neuropathic pain and/or peripheral neuropathy, hold or modify bortezomib for injection as outlined in Table 5. For information concerning rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone, see manufacturers prescribing information.. oPlatelet count should be at least 100 109/L and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) should be at least 1.5 109/L. oHemoglobin should be at least g/dL (at least 4.96 mmol/L). oNonhematologic toxicity should have recovered to Grade or baseline. oGrade or higher neutropenia, or platelet count not at or above 25 109/L. oIf, after bortezomib for injection has been withheld, the toxicity does not resolve, discontinue bortezomib for injection.. oIf toxicity resolves such that the patient has an ANC at or above 0.75 109/L and platelet count at or above 25 109/L, bortezomib for injection dose should be reduced by dose level (from 1.3 mg/m2 to mg/m2, or from mg/m2 to 0.7 mg/m2).. 2.6 Dosage and Dose Modifications for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma and Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma Bortezomib for injection (1.3 mg/m2/dose) is administered twice weekly for two weeks (Days 1, 4, 8, and 11) followed by ten day rest period (Days 12 to 21). For extended therapy of more than eight cycles, bortezomib for injection may be administered on the standard schedule or, for relapsed multiple myeloma, on maintenance schedule of once weekly for four weeks (Days 1, 8, 15, and 22) followed by 13 day rest period (Days 23 to 35) [see Clinical Studies (14)]. At least 72 hours should elapse between consecutive doses of bortezomib for injection.Patients with multiple myeloma who have previously responded to treatment with bortezomib for injection (either alone or in combination) and who have relapsed at least six months after their prior bortezomib for injection therapy may be started on bortezomib for injection at the last tolerated dose. Retreated patients are administered bortezomib for injection twice weekly (Days 1, 4, 8, and 11) every three weeks for maximum of eight cycles. At least 72 hours should elapse between consecutive doses of bortezomib for injection. Bortezomib for injection may be administered either as single agent or in combination with dexamethasone [see Clinical Studies (14.1)].Bortezomib for injection therapy should be withheld at the onset of any Grade nonhematological or Grade hematological toxicities excluding neuropathy as discussed below [see Warnings and Precautions (5)]. Once the symptoms of the toxicity have resolved, bortezomib for injection therapy may be reinitiated at 25% reduced dose (1.3 mg/m2/dose reduced to mg/m2/dose; mg/m2/dose reduced to 0.7 mg/m2/dose).For dose modifications guidelines for peripheral neuropathy, see section 2.7.. 2.7 Dose Modifications for Peripheral Neuropathy Starting bortezomib for injection subcutaneously may be considered for patients with pre-existing or at high risk of peripheral neuropathy. Patients with pre-existing severe neuropathy should be treated with bortezomib for injection only after careful risk-benefit assessment.Patients experiencing new or worsening peripheral neuropathy during bortezomib for injection therapy may require decrease in the dose and/or less dose-intense schedule.For dose or schedule modification guidelines for patients who experience bortezomib for injection-related neuropathic pain and/or peripheral neuropathy, see Table 5.Table 5: Recommended Dose Modification for Bortezomib related Neuropathic Pain and/or Peripheral Sensory or Motor Neuropathy Severity of Peripheral Neuropathy Signs and SymptomsGrading based on NCI Common Terminology Criteria CTCAE v4.0Modification of Dose and RegimenGrade (asymptomatic; loss of deep tendon reflexes or paresthesia) without pain or loss of functionNo actionGrade with pain or Grade (moderate symptoms; limiting instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADL)Instrumental ADL: refers to preparing meals, shopping for groceries or clothes, using telephone, managing money etc;) Reduce bortezomib to mg/m2 Grade with pain or Grade (severe symptoms; limiting self care ADLSelf care ADL: refers to bathing, dressing and undressing, feeding self, using the toilet, taking medications, and not bedridden.) Withhold bortezomib therapy until toxicity resolves. When toxicity resolves reinitiate with reduced dose of bortezomib at 0.7 mg/m2 once per week.Grade (life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated) Discontinue bortezomib. 2.8 Dosage in Patients with Hepatic Impairment Do not adjust the starting dose for patients with mild hepatic impairment. Start patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment at reduced dose of 0.7 mg/m2 per injection during the first cycle, and consider subsequent dose escalation to mg/m2 or further dose reduction to 0.5 mg/m2 based on patient tolerance (see Table 6) [see Use in Specific Populations (8.7), Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)]. Table 6: Recommended Starting Dose Modification for Bortezomib in Patients with Hepatic Impairment Bilirubin Level SGOT (AST) Levels Modification of Starting Dose Mild Less than or equal to 1x ULN More than ULN None More than 1x to 1.5x ULN Any None Moderate More than 1.5x to 3x ULN Any Reduce bortezomib to 0.7 mg/m2 in the first cycle. Consider dose escalation to mg/m2 or further dose reduction to 0.5 mg/m2 in subsequent cycles based on patient tolerability. Severe More than 3x ULN Any Abbreviations: SGOT serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase;AST aspartate aminotransferase; ULN upper limit of the normal range.. 2.9 Administration Precautions. The drug quantity contained in one vial (3.5 mg) may exceed the usual dose required. Caution should be used in calculating the dose to prevent overdose [see Dosage and Administration (2.10)]. When administered subcutaneously, sites for each injection (thigh or abdomen) should be rotated. New injections should be given at least one inch from an old site and never into areas where the site is tender, bruised, erythematous, or indurated.If local injection site reactions occur following bortezomib administration subcutaneously, less concentrated bortezomib solution (1 mg/mL instead of 2.5 mg/mL) may be administered subcutaneously [see Dosage and Administration 2.10)]. Alternatively, consider use of the intravenous route of administration [see Dosage and Administration 2.10)]. Bortezomib for injection is hazardous drug. Follow applicable special handling and disposal procedures.1 2.10 Reconstitution/Preparation for Intravenous and Subcutaneous Administration. Use proper aseptic technique. Reconstitute only with 0.9% sodium chloride. The reconstituted product should be clear and colorless solution.Different volumes of 0.9% sodium chloride are used to reconstitute the product for the different routes of administration. The reconstituted concentration of bortezomib for subcutaneous administration (2.5 mg/mL) is greater than the reconstituted concentration of bortezomib for intravenous administration (1 mg/mL). Because each route of administration has different reconstituted concentration, use caution when calculating the volume to be administered [see Dosage and Administration (2.9)]. For each 3.5 mg single-dose vial of bortezomib, reconstitute with the following volume of 0.9% sodium chloride based on route of administration (Table 7). Table 7: Reconstitution Volumes and Final Concentration for Intravenous and Subcutaneous AdministrationRoute of AdministrationBortezomib(mg/vial)Diluent(0.9% Sodium Chloride)Final Bortezomib Concentration (mg/mL)Intravenous3.5 mg3.5 mL1 mg/mLSubcutaneous3.5 mg1.4 mL2.5 mg/mLDose must be individualized to prevent overdosage. After determining patient body surface area (BSA) in square meters, use the following equations to calculate the total volume (mL) of reconstituted bortezomib to be administered: Intravenous Administration [1 mg/mL concentration] Bortezomib dose (mg/m2)x patient BSA (m2)1 mg/mL= Total Bortezomib volume (mL) to be administered Subcutaneous Administration [2.5 mg/mL concentration]Bortezomib dose (mg/m2)x patient BSA (m2)2.5 mg/mL= Total Bortezomib volume (mL) to be administeredStickers that indicate the route of administration are provided with each bortezomib vial. These stickers should be placed directly on the syringe of bortezomib once bortezomib is prepared to help alert practitioners of the correct route of administration for bortezomib.Parenteral drug products should be inspected visually for particulate matter and discoloration prior to administration whenever solution and container permit. If any discoloration or particulate matter is observed, the reconstituted product should not be used.StabilityUnopened vials of bortezomib for injection are stable until the date indicated on the package when stored in the original package protected from light.Bortezomib for injection contains no antimicrobial preservative. Administer reconstituted bortezomib for injection within eight hours of preparation. When reconstituted as directed, bortezomib for injection may be stored at 25C (77F). The reconstituted material may be stored in the original vial and/or the syringe prior to administration. The product may be stored for up to eight hours in syringe; however, total storage time for the reconstituted material must not exceed eight hours when exposed to normal indoor lighting.. Table 7: Reconstitution Volumes and Final Concentration for Intravenous and Subcutaneous Administration. Intravenous Administration [1 mg/mL concentration] Subcutaneous Administration [2.5 mg/mL concentration].

USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS SECTION.

8 USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS. Patients with diabetes may require close monitoring of blood glucose and adjustment of anti-diabetic medication. (8.8). Patients with diabetes may require close monitoring of blood glucose and adjustment of anti-diabetic medication. (8.8). 8.1 Pregnancy. Risk Summary Based on its mechanism of action [see Clinical Pharmacology 12.1)] and findings in animals, bortezomib can cause fetal harm when administered to pregnant woman. There are no studies with the use of bortezomib in pregnant women to inform drug-associated risks. Bortezomib caused embryo-fetal lethality in rabbits at doses lower than the clinical dose (see Data). Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to the fetus.Adverse outcomes in pregnancy occur regardless of the health of the mother or the use of medications. The estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage for the indicated population is unknown. In the U.S. general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies is to 4% and 15 to 20%, respectively. DataAnimal DataBortezomib was not teratogenic in nonclinical developmental toxicity studies in rats and rabbits at the highest dose tested (0.075 mg/kg; 0.5 mg/m2 in the rat and 0.05 mg/kg; 0.6 mg/m2 in the rabbit) when administered during organogenesis. These dosages are approximately 0.5 times the clinical dose of 1.3 mg/m2 based on body surface area.Bortezomib caused embryo-fetal lethality in rabbits at doses lower than the clinical dose (approximately 0.5 times the clinical dose of 1.3 mg/m2 based on body surface area). Pregnant rabbits given bortezomib during organogenesis at dose of 0.05 mg/kg (0.6 mg/m2) experienced significant postimplantation loss and decreased number of live fetuses. Live fetuses from these litters also showed significant decreases in fetal weight.. 8.2 Lactation Risk SummaryThere are no data on the presence of bortezomib or its metabolites in human milk, the effects of the drug on the breastfed child, or the effects of the drug on milk production. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk and because the potential for serious adverse reactions in breastfed child from bortezomib is unknown, advise nursing women not to breastfeed during treatment with bortezomib and for two months after treatment.. 8.3 Females and Males of Reproductive Potential Based on its mechanism of action and findings in animals, bortezomib can cause fetal harm when administered to pregnant woman [see Use in Specific Populations (8.1)]. Pregnancy TestingConduct pregnancy testing in females of reproductive potential prior to initiating bortezomib treatment.ContraceptionFemalesAdvise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with bortezomib and for seven months after the last dose.MalesMales with female partners of reproductive potential should use effective contraception during treatment with bortezomib and for four months after the last dose.InfertilityBased on the mechanism of action and findings in animals, bortezomib may have an effect on either male or female fertility [see Nonclinical Toxicology (13.1)]. 8.4 Pediatric Use. Safety and effectiveness have not been established in pediatric patients.The activity and safety of bortezomib in combination with intensive reinduction chemotherapy was evaluated in pediatric and young adult patients with lymphoid malignancies (pre-B cell ALL 77%, 16% with T-cell ALL, and 7% T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (LL)), all of whom relapsed within 36 months of initial diagnosis in single-arm multicenter, nonrandomized cooperative group trial. An effective reinduction multiagent chemotherapy regimen was administered in three blocks. Block included vincristine, prednisone, doxorubicin and pegaspargase; Block included cyclophosphamide, etoposide and methotrexate; Block included high-dose cytosine arabinoside and asparaginase. Bortezomib was administered at dose of 1.3 mg/m2 as bolus intravenous injection on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of Block and Days 1, 4, and of Block 2. There were 140 patients with ALL or LL enrolled and evaluated for safety. The median age was ten years (range: to 26), 57% were male, 70% were white, 14% were black, 4% were Asian, 2% were American Indian/ Alaska Native, 1% were Pacific Islander.The activity was evaluated in prespecified subset of the first 60 evaluable patients enrolled on the study with pre-B ALL <=21 years and relapsed <36 months from diagnosis. The complete remission (CR) rate at day 36 was compared to that in historical control set of patients who had received the identical backbone therapy without bortezomib. There was no evidence that the addition of bortezomib had any impact on the CR rate.No new safety concerns were observed when bortezomib was added to chemotherapy backbone regimen as compared with historical control group in which the backbone regimen was given without bortezomib.The BSA-normalized clearance of bortezomib in pediatric patients was similar to that observed in adults.. 8.5 Geriatric Use. Of the 669 patients enrolled in the relapsed multiple myeloma study, 245 (37%) were 65 years of age or older: 125 (38%) on the bortezomib arm and 120 (36%) on the dexamethasone arm. Median time to progression and median duration of response for patients >=65 were longer on bortezomib compared to dexamethasone [5.5 mo vs 4.3 mo, and 8.0 mo vs 4.9 mo, respectively]. On the bortezomib arm, 40% (n=46) of evaluable patients aged >=65 experienced response (CR+PR) vs 18% (n=21) on the dexamethasone arm. The incidence of Grade and events was 64%, 78% and 75% for bortezomib patients <=50, 51 to 64 and >=65 years old, respectively [see Adverse Reactions (6.1), Clinical Studies (14.1)]. No overall differences in safety or effectiveness were observed between patients >=age 65 and younger patients receiving bortezomib; but greater sensitivity of some older individuals cannot be ruled out.. 8.6 Renal Impairment. No starting dosage adjustment of bortezomib is recommended for patients with renal impairment. In patients requiring dialysis, bortezomib should be administered after the dialysis procedure [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)]. 8.7 Hepatic Impairment. No starting dosage adjustment of bortezomib is recommended for patients with mild hepatic impairment (total bilirubin <=1 ULN and AST ULN, or total bilirubin >1 to 1.5x ULN and any AST). The exposure of bortezomib is increased in patients with moderate (total bilirubin >=1.5 to 3x ULN and any AST) and severe (total bilirubin >3 ULN and any AST) hepatic impairment. Reduce the starting dose in patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment [see Dosage and Administration (2.8) Clinical Pharmacology 12.3)]. 8.8 Patients with Diabetes. During clinical trials, hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia were reported in diabetic patients receiving oral hypoglycemics. Patients on oral antidiabetic agents receiving bortezomib treatment may require close monitoring of their blood glucose levels and adjustment of the dose of their antidiabetic medication.

WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS SECTION.

5 WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS. oPeripheral Neuropathy: Manage with dose modification or discontinuation. (2.7) Patients with pre-existing severe neuropathy should be treated with bortezomib only after careful risk-benefit assessment. (2.7, 5.1)oHypotension: Use caution when treating patients taking antihypertensives, with history of syncope, or with dehydration. (5.2)oCardiac Toxicity: Worsening of and development of cardiac failure has occurred. Closely monitor patients with existing heart disease or risk factors for heart disease. (5.3)oPulmonary Toxicity: Acute respiratory syndromes have occurred. Monitor closely for new or worsening symptoms and consider interrupting bortezomib therapy. (5.4)oPosterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome: Consider MRI imaging for onset of visual or neurological symptoms; discontinue bortezomib if suspected. (5.5)oGastrointestinal Toxicity: Nausea, diarrhea, constipation, and vomiting may require use of antiemetic and antidiarrheal medications or fluid replacement. (5.6)oThrombocytopenia and Neutropenia: Monitor complete blood counts regularly throughout treatment. (5.7)oTumor Lysis Syndrome: Closely monitor patients with high tumor burden. (5.8) oHepatic Toxicity: Monitor hepatic enzymes during treatment. Interrupt bortezomib therapy to assess reversibility. (5.9) oThrombotic Microangiopathy: Monitor for signs and symptoms. Discontinue bortezomib if suspected. (5.10)oEmbryo-Fetal Toxicity: Bortezomib can cause fetal harm. Advise females of reproductive potential and males with female partners of reproductive potential of the potential risk to fetus and to use effective contraception. (5.11). oPeripheral Neuropathy: Manage with dose modification or discontinuation. (2.7) Patients with pre-existing severe neuropathy should be treated with bortezomib only after careful risk-benefit assessment. (2.7, 5.1). oHypotension: Use caution when treating patients taking antihypertensives, with history of syncope, or with dehydration. (5.2). oCardiac Toxicity: Worsening of and development of cardiac failure has occurred. Closely monitor patients with existing heart disease or risk factors for heart disease. (5.3). oPulmonary Toxicity: Acute respiratory syndromes have occurred. Monitor closely for new or worsening symptoms and consider interrupting bortezomib therapy. (5.4). oPosterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome: Consider MRI imaging for onset of visual or neurological symptoms; discontinue bortezomib if suspected. (5.5). oGastrointestinal Toxicity: Nausea, diarrhea, constipation, and vomiting may require use of antiemetic and antidiarrheal medications or fluid replacement. (5.6). oThrombocytopenia and Neutropenia: Monitor complete blood counts regularly throughout treatment. (5.7). oTumor Lysis Syndrome: Closely monitor patients with high tumor burden. (5.8) oHepatic Toxicity: Monitor hepatic enzymes during treatment. Interrupt bortezomib therapy to assess reversibility. (5.9) oThrombotic Microangiopathy: Monitor for signs and symptoms. Discontinue bortezomib if suspected. (5.10). oEmbryo-Fetal Toxicity: Bortezomib can cause fetal harm. Advise females of reproductive potential and males with female partners of reproductive potential of the potential risk to fetus and to use effective contraception. (5.11). 5.1 Peripheral Neuropathy. Bortezomib treatment causes peripheral neuropathy that is predominantly sensory; however, cases of severe sensory and motor peripheral neuropathy have been reported. Patients with pre-existing symptoms (numbness, pain or burning feeling in the feet or hands) and/or signs of peripheral neuropathy may experience worsening peripheral neuropathy (including >=Grade 3) during treatment with bortezomib. Patients should be monitored for symptoms of neuropathy, such as burning sensation, hyperesthesia, hypoesthesia, paresthesia, discomfort, neuropathic pain or weakness. In the Phase relapsed multiple myeloma trial comparing bortezomib subcutaneous vs intravenous, the incidence of Grade >=2 peripheral neuropathy was 24% for subcutaneous and 39% for intravenous. Grade >=3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 6% of patients in the subcutaneous treatment group, compared with 15% in the intravenous treatment group [see Adverse Reactions (6.1)]. Starting bortezomib subcutaneously may be considered for patients with pre-existing or at high risk of peripheral neuropathy.Patients experiencing new or worsening peripheral neuropathy during bortezomib therapy may require decrease in the dose and/or less dose-intense schedule [see Dosage and Administration (2.7)]. In the bortezomib vs dexamethasone Phase relapsed multiple myeloma study, improvement in or resolution of peripheral neuropathy was reported in 48% of patients with >=Grade peripheral neuropathy following dose adjustment or interruption. Improvement in or resolution of peripheral neuropathy was reported in 73% of patients who discontinued due to Grade neuropathy or who had >=Grade peripheral neuropathy in the Phase multiple myeloma studies. The long-term outcome of peripheral neuropathy has not been studied in mantle cell lymphoma.. 5.2 Hypotension. The incidence of hypotension (postural, orthostatic, and hypotension NOS) was 8% [see Adverse Reactions (6.1)]. These events are observed throughout therapy. Patients with history of syncope, patients receiving medications known to be associated with hypotension, and patients who are dehydrated may be at increased risk of hypotension. Management of orthostatic/postural hypotension may include adjustment of antihypertensive medications, hydration, and administration of mineralocorticoids and/or sympathomimetics.. 5.3 Cardiac Toxicity. Acute development or exacerbation of congestive heart failure and new onset of decreased left ventricular ejection fraction have occurred during bortezomib therapy, including reports in patients with no risk factors for decreased left ventricular ejection fraction [see Adverse Reactions (6.1)]. Patients with risk factors for, or existing heart disease should be frequently monitored. In the relapsed multiple myeloma study of bortezomib vs dexamethasone, the incidence of any treatment-related cardiac disorder was 8% and 5% in the bortezomib and dexamethasone groups, respectively. The incidence of adverse reactions suggestive of heart failure (acute pulmonary edema, pulmonary edema, cardiac failure, congestive cardiac failure, cardiogenic shock) was <=1% for each individual reaction in the bortezomib group. In the dexamethasone group the incidence was <=1% for cardiac failure and congestive cardiac failure; there were no reported reactions of acute pulmonary edema, pulmonary edema, or cardiogenic shock. There have been isolated cases of QT-interval prolongation in clinical studies; causality has not been established.. 5.4 Pulmonary Toxicity. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) and acute diffuse infiltrative pulmonary disease of unknown etiology such as pneumonitis, interstitial pneumonia, lung infiltration have occurred in patients receiving bortezomib. Some of these events have been fatal.In clinical trial, the first two patients given high-dose cytarabine (2 g/m2 per day) by continuous infusion with daunorubicin and bortezomib for relapsed acute myelogenous leukemia died of ARDS early in the course of therapy.There have been reports of pulmonary hypertension associated with bortezomib administration in the absence of left heart failure or significant pulmonary disease.In the event of new or worsening cardiopulmonary symptoms, consider interrupting bortezomib until prompt and comprehensive diagnostic evaluation is conducted.. 5.5 Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES). Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES; formerly termed Reversible Posterior Leukoencephalopathy Syndrome (RPLS)) has occurred in patients receiving bortezomib. PRES is rare, reversible, neurological disorder which can present with seizure, hypertension, headache, lethargy, confusion, blindness, and other visual and neurological disturbances. Brain imaging, preferably MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging), is used to confirm the diagnosis. In patients developing PRES, discontinue bortezomib. The safety of reinitiating bortezomib therapy in patients previously experiencing PRES is not known.. 5.6 Gastrointestinal Toxicity. Bortezomib treatment can cause nausea, diarrhea, constipation, and vomiting [see Adverse Reactions (6.1)] sometimes requiring use of antiemetic and antidiarrheal medications. Ileus can occur. Fluid and electrolyte replacement should be administered to prevent dehydration. Interrupt bortezomib for severe symptoms.. 5.7 Thrombocytopenia/Neutropenia. Bortezomib is associated with thrombocytopenia and neutropenia that follow cyclical pattern with nadirs occurring following the last dose of each cycle and typically recovering prior to initiation of the subsequent cycle. The cyclical pattern of platelet and neutrophil decreases and recovery remain consistent in the studies of multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma, with no evidence of cumulative thrombocytopenia or neutropenia in the treatment regimens studied. Monitor complete blood counts (CBC) frequently during treatment with bortezomib. Measure platelet counts prior to each dose of bortezomib. Adjust dose/schedule for thrombocytopenia [see Dosage and Administration 2.6)]. Gastrointestinal and intracerebral hemorrhage has occurred during thrombocytopenia in association with bortezomib. Support with transfusions and supportive care, according to published guidelines. In the single-agent, relapsed multiple myeloma study of bortezomib vs dexamethasone, the mean platelet count nadir measured was approximately 40% of baseline. The severity of thrombocytopenia related to pretreatment platelet count is shown in Table 8. The incidence of bleeding (>=Grade 3) was 2% on the bortezomib arm and was <1% in the dexamethasone arm. Table 8: Severity of Thrombocytopenia Related to Pretreatment Platelet Count in the Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Study of Bortezomib vs Dexamethasone PretreatmentPlatelet CountA baseline platelet count of 50,000/uL was required for study eligibility. Number of Patients(N=331)Data were missing at baseline for one patient. Number (%) of Patients with Platelet Count <10,000/uLNumber (%) of Patients with Platelet Count10,000 to 25,000/uL>=75,000/uL3098 (3%)36 (12%)>=50,000/uL to <75,000/uL142 (14%)11 (79%)>=10,000/uL to <50,000/uL71 (14%)5 (71%)In the combination study of bortezomib with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone (VcR-CAP) in previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma patients, the incidence of thrombocytopenia (>=Grade 4) was 32% vs 1% for the rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) arm as shown in Table 12. The incidence of bleeding events (>=Grade 3) was 1.7% in the VcR-CAP arm (four patients) and was 1.2% in the R-CHOP arm (three patients). Platelet transfusions were given to 23% of the patients in the VcR-CAP arm and 3% of the patients in the R-CHOP arm.The incidence of neutropenia (>=Grade 4) was 70% in the VcR-CAP arm and was 52% in the R-CHOP arm. The incidence of febrile neutropenia (>=Grade 4) was 5% in the VcR-CAP arm and was 6% in the R-CHOP arm. Myeloid growth factor support was provided at rate of 78% in the VcR-CAP arm and 61% in the R-CHOP arm.. Table 8: Severity of Thrombocytopenia Related to Pretreatment Platelet Count in the Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Study of Bortezomib vs Dexamethasone 5.8 Tumor Lysis Syndrome. Tumor lysis syndrome has been reported with bortezomib therapy. Patients at risk of tumor lysis syndrome are those with high tumor burden prior to treatment. Monitor patients closely and take appropriate precautions.. 5.9 Hepatic Toxicity. Cases of acute liver failure have been reported in patients receiving multiple concomitant medications and with serious underlying medical conditions. Other reported hepatic reactions include hepatitis, increases in liver enzymes, and hyperbilirubinemia. Interrupt bortezomib therapy to assess reversibility. There is limited rechallenge information in these patients.. 5.10 Thrombotic Microangiopathy Cases, sometimes fatal, of thrombotic microangiopathy, including thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura/hemolytic uremic syndrome (TTP/HUS), have been reported in the postmarketing setting in patients who received bortezomib. Monitor for signs and symptoms of TTP/HUS. If the diagnosis is suspected, stop bortezomib and evaluate. If the diagnosis of TTP/HUS is excluded, consider restarting bortezomib. The safety of reinitiating bortezomib therapy in patients previously experiencing TTP/HUS is not known.. 5.11 Embryo-Fetal Toxicity. Based on the mechanism of action and findings in animals, bortezomib can cause fetal harm when administered to pregnant woman. Bortezomib administered to rabbits during organogenesis at dose approximately 0.5 times the clinical dose of 1.3 mg/m2 based on body surface area caused postimplantation loss and decreased number of live fetuses [see Use in Specific Populations 8.1)]. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with bortezomib and for seven months following treatment. Advise males with female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with bortezomib and for four months following treatment. If bortezomib is used during pregnancy or if the patient becomes pregnant during bortezomib treatment, the patient should be apprised of the potential risk to the fetus [see Use in Specific Populations 8.1, 8.3), Nonclinical Toxicology (13.1)].