ADVERSE REACTIONS SECTION.

ADVERSE REACTIONS. Adverse events are derived from controlled clinical trials conducted in the United States, Canada, and Europe. The reference drugs were isoflurane, enflurane, and propofol in adults and halothane in pediatric patients. The studies were conducted using variety of premedications, other anesthetics, and surgical procedures of varying length. Most adverse events reported were mild and transient, and may reflect the surgical procedures, patient characteristics (including disease) and/or medications administered.Of the 5182 patients enrolled in the clinical trials, 2906 were exposed to sevoflurane, USP, including 118 adults and 507 pediatric patients who underwent mask induction. Each patient was counted once for each type of adverse event. Adverse events reported in patients in clinical trials and considered to be possibly or probably related to sevoflurane, USP are presented within each body system in order of decreasing frequency in the following listings. One case of malignant hyperthermia was reported in pre-registration clinical trials.Adverse Events During the Induction Period (from Onset of Anesthesia by Mask Induction to Surgical Incision) Incidence >1%Adult Patients (N 118)Cardiovascular:Bradycardia 5%, Hypotension 4%, Tachycardia 2%Nervous System:Agitation 7%Respiratory System:Laryngospasm 8%, Airway obstruction 8%, Breathholding 5%, Cough Increased 5%Pediatric Patients (N 507)Cardiovascular:Tachycardia 6%, Hypotension 4%Nervous System:Agitation 15%Respiratory System:Breathholding 5%, Cough Increased 5%, Laryngospasm 3%, Apnea 2%Digestive System:Increased salivation 2%Adverse Events During Maintenance and Emergence Periods, Incidence >1% (N 2906)Body as whole:Fever 1%, Shivering 6%, Hypothermia 1%, Movement 1%, Headache 1%Cardiovascular:Hypotension 11%, Hypertension 2%, Bradycardia 5%, Tachycardia 2%Nervous System:Somnolence 9%, Agitation 9%, Dizziness 4%, Increased salivation 4%Digestive System:Nausea 25%, Vomiting 18%Respiratory System:Cough increased 11%, Breathholding 2%, Laryngospasm 2%Adverse Events, All Patients in Clinical Trials (N 2906), All Anesthetic Periods, Incidence <1% (Reported in or more patients)Body as whole:Asthenia, PainCardiovascular:Arrhythmia, Ventricular Extrasystoles, Supraventricular Extrasystoles, Complete AV Block, Bigeminy, Hemorrhage, Inverted Wave, Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Arrhythmia, Second Degree AV Block, Syncope, S-T DepressedNervous System:Crying, Nervousness, Confusion, Hypertonia, Dry Mouth, InsomniaRespiratory System:Sputum Increased, Apnea, Hypoxia, Wheezing, Bronchospasm, Hyperventilation, Pharyngitis, Hiccup, Hypoventilation, Dyspnea, StridorMetabolism and Nutrition:Increases in LDH, AST, ALT, BUN, Alkaline Phosphatase, Creatinine, Bilirubinemia, Glycosuria, Fluorosis, Albuminuria, Hypophosphatemia, Acidosis, HyperglycemiaHemic and Lymphatic System:Leucocytosis, ThrombocytopeniaSkin and Special Senses:Amblyopia, Pruritus, Taste Perversion, Rash, ConjunctivitisUrogenital:Urination Impaired, Urine Abnormality, Urinary Retention, OliguriaSee WARNINGS for information regarding malignant hyperthermia.. Post-Marketing Adverse Events. The following adverse events have been identified during post-approval use of sevoflurane, USP. Due to the spontaneous nature of these reports, the actual incidence and relationship of sevoflurane, USP to these events cannot be established with certainty. Central Nervous SystemSeizures Post-marketing reports indicate that sevoflurane, USP use has been associated with seizures. The majority of cases were in children and young adults, most of whom had no medical history of seizures. Several cases reported no concomitant medications, and at least one case was confirmed by EEG. Although many cases were single seizures that resolved spontaneously or after treatment, cases of multiple seizures have also been reported. Seizures have occurred during, or soon after sevoflurane, USP induction, during emergence, and during post-operative recovery up to day following anesthesia. CardiacCardiac arrestHepaticoCases of mild, moderate and severe post-operative hepatic dysfunction or hepatitis with or without jaundice have been reported. Histological evidence was not provided for any of the reported hepatitis cases. In most of these cases, patients had underlying hepatic conditions or were under treatment with drugs known to cause hepatic dysfunction. Most of the reported events were transient and resolved spontaneously (see PRECAUTIONS).oHepatic necrosisoHepatic failureOtheroMalignant hyperthermia (see CONTRAINDICATIONS and WARNINGS)oAllergic reactions, such as rash, urticaria, pruritus, bronchospasm, anaphylactic or anaphylactoid reactions (see CONTRAINDICATIONS)oReports of hypersensitivity (including contact dermatitis, rash, dyspnea, wheezing, chest discomfort, swelling face, or anaphylactic reaction) have been received, particularly in association with long-term occupational exposure to inhaled anesthetic agents, including sevoflurane (see OCCUPATIONAL CAUTION).. oCases of mild, moderate and severe post-operative hepatic dysfunction or hepatitis with or without jaundice have been reported. Histological evidence was not provided for any of the reported hepatitis cases. In most of these cases, patients had underlying hepatic conditions or were under treatment with drugs known to cause hepatic dysfunction. Most of the reported events were transient and resolved spontaneously (see PRECAUTIONS).. oHepatic necrosis. oHepatic failure. oMalignant hyperthermia (see CONTRAINDICATIONS and WARNINGS). oAllergic reactions, such as rash, urticaria, pruritus, bronchospasm, anaphylactic or anaphylactoid reactions (see CONTRAINDICATIONS). oReports of hypersensitivity (including contact dermatitis, rash, dyspnea, wheezing, chest discomfort, swelling face, or anaphylactic reaction) have been received, particularly in association with long-term occupational exposure to inhaled anesthetic agents, including sevoflurane (see OCCUPATIONAL CAUTION).. Laboratory Findings. Transient elevations in glucose, liver function tests, and white blood cell count may occur as with use of other anesthetic agents.

CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY SECTION.

CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY. Sevoflurane, USP is an inhalational anesthetic agent for use in induction and maintenance of general anesthesia. Minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of sevoflurane, USP in oxygen for 40-year-old adult is 2.1%. The MAC of sevoflurane, USP decreases with age (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION for details).. Pharmacokinetics. Uptake and Distribution. SolubilityBecause of the low solubility of sevoflurane, USP in blood (blood/gas partition coefficient 37C 0.63-0.69), minimal amount of sevoflurane, USP is required to be dissolved in the blood before the alveolar partial pressure is in equilibrium with the arterial partial pressure. Therefore there is rapid rate of increase in the alveolar (end-tidal) concentration (FA) toward the inspired concentration (FI) during induction.. Induction of Anesthesia. In study in which seven healthy male volunteers were administered 70% N2O/30% O2 for 30 minutes followed by 1.0% sevoflurane, USP and 0.6% isoflurane for another 30 minutes the FA/FI ratio was greater for sevoflurane, USP than isoflurane at all time points. The time for the concentration in the alveoli to reach 50% of the inspired concentration was 4-8 minutes for isoflurane and approximately minute for sevoflurane, USP.FA/FI data from this study were compared with FA/FI data of other halogenated anesthetic agents from another study. When all data were normalized to isoflurane, the uptake and distribution of sevoflurane, USP was shown to be faster than isoflurane and halothane, but slower than desflurane. The results are depicted in Figure 3.. Recovery from Anesthesia. The low solubility of sevoflurane, USP facilitates rapid elimination via the lungs. The rate of elimination is quantified as the rate of change of the alveolar (end-tidal) concentration following termination of anesthesia (FA), relative to the last alveolar concentration (Fa0) measured immediately before discontinuance of the anesthetic. In the healthy volunteer study described above, rate of elimination of sevoflurane, USP was similar compared with desflurane, but faster compared with either halothane or isoflurane. These results are depicted in Figure 4.Yasuda N, Lockhart S, Eger EI II, et al: Comparison of kinetics of sevoflurane, and isoflurane in humans. Anesth Analg 72:316, 1991.. Figure 3. Ratio of Concentration of Anesthetic in Alveolar Gas to Inspired Gas. Figure - Concentration of Anesthetic in Alveolar Gas Following Termination of Anesthesia. Protein Binding. The effects of sevoflurane, USP on the displacement of drugs from serum and tissue proteins have not been investigated. Other fluorinated volatile anesthetics have been shown to displace drugs from serum and tissue proteins in vitro. The clinical significance of this is unknown. Clinical studies have shown no untoward effects when sevoflurane, USP is administered to patients taking drugs that are highly bound and have small volume of distribution (e.g., phenytoin).. Metabolism. Sevoflurane, USP is metabolized by cytochrome P450 2E1, to hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP) with release of inorganic fluoride and CO2. Once formed HFIP is rapidly conjugated with glucuronic acid and eliminated as urinary metabolite. No other metabolic pathways for sevoflurane, USP have been identified. In vivo metabolism studies suggest that approximately 5% of the sevoflurane, USP dose may be metabolized.Cytochrome P450 2E1 is the principal isoform identified for sevoflurane, USP metabolism and this may be induced by chronic exposure to isoniazid and ethanol. This is similar to the metabolism of isoflurane and enflurane and is distinct from that of methoxyflurane which is metabolized via variety of cytochrome P450 isoforms. The metabolism of sevoflurane, USP is not inducible by barbiturates. As shown in Figure 5, inorganic fluoride concentrations peak within hours of the end of sevoflurane, USP anesthesia and return to baseline concentrations within 48 hours post-anesthesia in the majority of cases (67%). The rapid and extensive pulmonary elimination of sevoflurane, USP minimizes the amount of anesthetic available for metabolism.Cousins M.J., Greenstein L.R., Hitt B.A., et al: Metabolism and renal effects of enflurane in man. Anesthesiology 44:44; 1976 and Sevo-93-044+.Legend:Pre-Anesth. Pre-anesthesia. Figure - Serum Inorganic Fluoride Concentration for Sevoflurane and Other Volatile Anesthetics. Elimination. Up to 3.5% of the sevoflurane, USP dose appears in the urine as inorganic fluoride. Studies on fluoride indicate that up to 50% of fluoride clearance is nonrenal (via fluoride being taken up into bone).. Pharmacokinetics of Fluoride Ion. Fluoride ion concentrations are influenced by the duration of anesthesia, the concentration of sevoflurane, USP administered, and the composition of the anesthetic gas mixture. In studies where anesthesia was maintained purely with sevoflurane, USP for periods ranging from to hours, peak fluoride concentrations ranged between 12 uM and 90 uM. As shown in Figure 6, peak concentrations occur within hours of the end of anesthesia and are less than 25 uM (475 ng/mL) for the majority of the population after 10 hours. The half-life is in the range of 15-23 hours.It has been reported that following administration of methoxyflurane, serum inorganic fluoride concentrations >50 uM were correlated with the development of vasopressin-resistant, polyuric, renal failure. In clinical trials with sevoflurane, USP, there were no reports of toxicity associated with elevated fluoride ion levels.. Fluoride Concentrations After Repeat Exposure and in Special Populations. Fluoride concentrations have been measured after single, extended, and repeat exposure to sevoflurane, USP in normal surgical and special patient populations, and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined.Compared with healthy individuals, the fluoride ion half-life was prolonged in patients with renal impairment, but not in the elderly. study in patients with hepatic impairment suggests slight prolongation of the half-life. The mean half-life in patients with renal impairment averaged approximately 33 hours (range 21-61 hours) as compared to mean of approximately 21 hours (range 10-48 hours) in normal healthy individuals. The mean half-life in the elderly (greater than 65 years) approximated 24 hours (range 18-72 hours). The mean half-life in individuals with hepatic impairment was 23 hours (range 16-47 hours). Mean maximal fluoride values (Cmax) determined in individual studies of special populations are displayed below.Table 1: Fluoride Ion Estimates in Special Populations Following Administration of Sevoflurane, USPnAge (yr)Duration (hr)Dose (MACohr)Cmax (uM)PEDIATRIC PATIENTS Anesthetic Sevoflurane-O2 760 110.81.112.6 Sevoflurane-O2 401 112.23.016.0 Sevoflurane/N2O255 131.92.421.3 Sevoflurane/N2O420 182.42.218.4 Sevoflurane/N2O401 112.02.615.5ELDERLY3365 932.61.425.6RENAL2129 832.51.026.1HEPATIC842 793.62.230.6OBESE3524 733.01.738.0n number of patients studied.. Figure Fluoride Ion Concentration Following Administration of Sevoflurane. Pharmacodynamics. Changes in the depth of sevoflurane, USP anesthesia rapidly follow changes in the inspired concentration.In the sevoflurane, USP clinical program, the following recovery variables were evaluated:1.Time to events measured from the end of study drug:oTime to removal of the endotracheal tube (extubation time)oTime required for the patient to open his/her eyes on verbal command (emergence time)oTime to respond to simple command (e.g., squeeze my hand) or demonstrates purposeful movement (response to command time, orientation time)2.Recovery of cognitive function and motor coordination was evaluated based on:opsychomotor performance tests (Digit Symbol Substitution Test [DSST], Treiger Dot Test)othe results of subjective (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) and objective (objective pain-discomfort scale [OPDS]) measurementsotime to administration of the first post-anesthesia analgesic medicationoassessments of post-anesthesia patient status3.Other recovery times were:otime to achieve an Aldrete Score of >=8otime required for the patient to be eligible for discharge from the recovery area, per standard criteria at siteotime when the patient was eligible for discharge from the hospitalotime when the patient was able to sit up or stand without dizzinessSome of these variables are summarized as follows:Table 2: Induction and Recovery Variables for Evaluable Pediatric Patients in Two Comparative Studies: Sevoflurane versus Halothane Time to End-Point (min)Sevoflurane Mean +- SEMHalothane Mean +- SEMInduction2.0 +- 0.2 (n=294)2.7 +- 0.2 (n=252)Emergence11.3 +- 0.7 (n=293)15.8 +- 0.8 (n=252)Response to command13.7 +- 1.0 (n=271)19.3 +- 1.1 (n=230)First analgesia52.2 +- 8.5 (n=216)67.6 +- 10.6 (n=150)Eligible for recovery discharge76.5 +- 2.0 (n=292)81.1 +- 1.9 (n=246)n number of patients with recording of events.Table 3: Recovery Variables for Evaluable Adult Patients in Two Comparative Studies: Sevoflurane versus Isoflurane Time to Parameter: (min)Sevoflurane Mean +- SEMIsoflurane Mean +- SEMEmergence7.7 +- 0.3 (n=395)9.1 +- 0.3 (n=348)Response to command8.1 +- 0.3 (n=395)9.7 +- 0.3 (n=345)First analgesia42.7 +- 3.0 (n=269)52.9 +- 4.2 (n=228)Eligible for recovery discharge87.6 +- 5.3 (n=244)79.1 +- 5.2 (n=252)n number of patients with recording of recovery events.Table 4: Meta-Analyses for Induction and Emergence Variables for Evaluable Adult Patients in Comparative Studies: Sevoflurane versus Propofol ParameterNo. of StudiesSevofluraneMean +- SEMPropofolMean +- SEMMean maintenance anesthesia exposure31.0 MACohr +- 0.8 (n=259)7.2 mg/kg/hr +- 2.6 (n=258)Time to induction: (min)13.1 +- 0.18 (n=93)2.2 +- 0.18 (n=93)Time to emergence: (min)38.6 +- 0.57 (n=255)11.0 +- 0.57 (n=260)Time to respond to command: (min)39.9 +- 0.60 (n=257)12.1 +- 0.60 (n=260)Time to first analgesia: (min)343.8 +- 3.79 (n=177)57.9 +- 3.68 (n=179)Time to eligibility for recovery discharge: (min)3116.0 +- 4.15 (n=257)115.6 +- 3.98 (n=261)n number of patients with recording of events.. 1.Time to events measured from the end of study drug:oTime to removal of the endotracheal tube (extubation time)oTime required for the patient to open his/her eyes on verbal command (emergence time)oTime to respond to simple command (e.g., squeeze my hand) or demonstrates purposeful movement (response to command time, orientation time). oTime to removal of the endotracheal tube (extubation time). oTime required for the patient to open his/her eyes on verbal command (emergence time). oTime to respond to simple command (e.g., squeeze my hand) or demonstrates purposeful movement (response to command time, orientation time). 2.Recovery of cognitive function and motor coordination was evaluated based on:opsychomotor performance tests (Digit Symbol Substitution Test [DSST], Treiger Dot Test)othe results of subjective (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) and objective (objective pain-discomfort scale [OPDS]) measurementsotime to administration of the first post-anesthesia analgesic medicationoassessments of post-anesthesia patient status. opsychomotor performance tests (Digit Symbol Substitution Test [DSST], Treiger Dot Test). othe results of subjective (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) and objective (objective pain-discomfort scale [OPDS]) measurements. otime to administration of the first post-anesthesia analgesic medication. oassessments of post-anesthesia patient status. 3.Other recovery times were:otime to achieve an Aldrete Score of >=8otime required for the patient to be eligible for discharge from the recovery area, per standard criteria at siteotime when the patient was eligible for discharge from the hospitalotime when the patient was able to sit up or stand without dizziness. otime to achieve an Aldrete Score of >=8. otime required for the patient to be eligible for discharge from the recovery area, per standard criteria at site. otime when the patient was eligible for discharge from the hospital. otime when the patient was able to sit up or stand without dizziness. Cardiovascular Effects. Sevoflurane, USP was studied in 14 healthy volunteers (18-35 years old) comparing sevoflurane-O2(Sevo/O2) to sevoflurane-N2O/O2 (Sevo/N2O/O2) during hours of anesthesia. During controlled ventilation, hemodynamic parameters measured are shown in Figures 7-10:Sevoflurane, USP is dose-related cardiac depressant. Sevoflurane, USP does not produce increases in heart rate at doses less than MAC.A study investigating the epinephrine induced arrhythmogenic effect of sevoflurane, USP versus isoflurane in adult patients undergoing transsphenoidal hypophysectomy demonstrated that the threshold dose of epinephrine (i.e., the dose at which the first sign of arrhythmia was observed) producing multiple ventricular arrhythmias was mcg/kg with both sevoflurane, USP and isoflurane. Consequently, the interaction of sevoflurane, USP with epinephrine appears to be equal to that seen with isoflurane.. Figure - Heart Rate. Figure - Mean Arterial Pressure. Figure - Systemic Vascular Resistance. Figure 10: Cardiac Index. Clinical Trials. Sevoflurane, USP was administered to total of 3185 patients. The types of patients are summarized as follows:Table 5: Patients Receiving Sevoflurane, USP in Clinical Trials Type of PatientsNumber StudiedADULT2223 Cesarean Delivery 29 Cardiovascular and patients at risk of myocardial ischemia246 Neurosurgical 22 Hepatic impairment Renal impairment 35PEDIATRIC962Clinical experience with these patients is described below.. Adult Anesthesia. The efficacy of sevoflurane, USP in comparison to isoflurane, enflurane, and propofol was investigated in outpatient and 25 inpatient studies involving 3591 adult patients. Sevoflurane, USP was found to be comparable to isoflurane, enflurane, and propofol for the maintenance of anesthesia in adult patients. Patients administered sevoflurane, USP showed shorter times (statistically significant) to some recovery events (extubation, response to command, and orientation) than patients who received isoflurane or propofol.. Mask Induction. Sevoflurane, USP has nonpungent odor and does not cause respiratory irritability. Sevoflurane, USP is suitable for mask induction in adults. In 196 patients, mask induction was smooth and rapid, with complications occurring with the following frequencies: cough, 6%; breathholding, 6%; agitation, 6%; laryngospasm, 5%.. Ambulatory Surgery. Sevoflurane, USP was compared to isoflurane and propofol for maintenance of anesthesia supplemented with N2O in two studies involving 786 adult (18-84 years of age) ASA Class I, II, or III patients. Shorter times to emergence and response to commands (statistically significant) were observed with sevoflurane, USP compared to isoflurane and propofol.Table 6: Recovery Parameters in Two Outpatient Surgery Studies: Least Squares Mean +- SEM Sevoflurane/N2OIsoflurane/N2OSevoflurane/N2OPropofol/N2OMeanMaintenanceAnesthesiaExposure +- SD0.64 +- 0.03 MACohr(n=245)0.66 +- 0.03 MACohr(n=249)0.8 +- 0.5 MACohr(n=166)7.3 +- 2.3 mg/kg/hr(n=166)Time to Emergence (min)8.2 +- 0.4(n=246)9.3 +- 0.3(n=251)8.3 +- 0.7(n=137)10.4 +- 0.7(n=142)Time to Respondto Commands(min)8.5 +- 0.4(n=246)9.8 +- 0.4(n=248)9.1 +- 0.7(n=139)11.5 +- 0.7(n=143)Time to FirstAnalgesia (min)45.9 +- 4.7(n=160)59.1 +- 6.0(n=252)46.1 +- 5.4(n=83)60.0 +- 4.7(n=88)Time toEligibility forDischarge fromRecovery Area (min)87.6 +- 5.3(n=244)79.1 +- 5.2(n=252)103.1 +- 3.8(n=139)105.1 +- 3.7(n=143)n number of patients with recording of recovery events.. Inpatient Surgery. Sevoflurane, USP was compared to isoflurane and propofol for maintenance of anesthesia supplemented with N2O in two multicenter studies involving 741 adult ASA Class I, II or III (18-92 years of age) patients. Shorter times to emergence, command response, and first post-anesthesia analgesia (statistically significant) were observed with sevoflurane, USP compared to isoflurane and propofol.Table 7: Recovery Parameters in Two Inpatient Surgery Studies: Least Squares Mean +- SEMSevoflurane/N2OIsoflurane/N2OSevoflurane/N2OPropofol/N2OMean Maintenance Anesthesia Exposure +- SD1.27 MACohr+- 0.05 (n=271)1.58 MACohr+- 0.06(n=282)1.43 MACohr+- 0.94(n=93)7.0 mg/kg/hr+- 2.9(n=92)Time to Emergence (min)11.0 +- 0.6(n=270)16.4 +- 0.6(n=281)8.8 +- 1.2(n=92)13.2 +- 1.2(n=92)Time to Respond to Commands (min)12.8 +- 0.7(n=270) 18.4 +- 0.7(n=281)11.0 +- 1.20 (n=92)14.4 +- 1.21(n=91)Time to First Analgesia (min)46.1 +- 3.0(n=233)55.4 +- 3.2(n=242)37.8 +- 3.3(n=82)49.2 +- 3.3(n=79)Time to Eligibility for Discharge from Recovery Area (min)139.2 +- 15.6(n=268)165.9 +- 16.3(n=282)148.4 +- 8.9(n=92)141.4 +- 8.9(n=92)n number of patients with recording of recovery events.. Pediatric Anesthesia. The concentration of sevoflurane, USP required for maintenance of general anesthesia is age-dependent (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION). Sevoflurane, USP or halothane was used to anesthetize 1620 pediatric patients aged day to 18 years, and ASA physical status or II (948 sevoflurane, USP, 672 halothane). In one study involving 90 infants and children, there were no clinically significant decreases in heart rate compared to awake values at MAC. Systolic blood pressure decreased 15-20% in comparison to awake values following administration of MAC sevoflurane, USP; however, clinically significant hypotension requiring immediate intervention did not occur. Overall incidences of bradycardia [more than 20 beats/min lower than normal (80 beats/min)] in comparative studies was 3% for sevoflurane, USP and 7% for halothane. Patients who received sevoflurane, USP had slightly faster emergence times (12 vs. 19 minutes), and higher incidence of post-anesthesia agitation (14% vs. 10%).Sevoflurane, USP (n=91) was compared to halothane (n=89) in single-center study for elective repair or palliation of congenital heart disease. The patients ranged in age from days to 11.8 years with an ASA physical status of II, III, and IV (18%, 68%, and 13% respectively). No significant differences were demonstrated between treatment groups with respect to the primary outcome measures: cardiovascular decompensation and severe arterial desaturation. Adverse event data was limited to the study outcome variables collected during surgery and before institution of cardiopulmonary bypass.. Mask Induction. Sevoflurane, USP has nonpungent odor and is suitable for mask induction in pediatric patients. In controlled pediatric studies in which mask induction was performed, the incidence of induction events is shown below (see ADVERSE REACTIONS).Table 8: Incidence of Pediatric Induction Events Sevoflurane (n=836)Halothane (n=660)Agitation14%11%Cough6%10%Breathholding5%6%Secretions3%3%Laryngospasm2%2%Bronchospasm<1%0%n number of patients.. Ambulatory Surgery. Sevoflurane, USP (n=518) was compared to halothane (n=382) for the maintenance of anesthesia in pediatric outpatients. All patients received N2O and many received fentanyl, midazolam, bupivacaine, or lidocaine. The time to eligibility for discharge from post-anesthesia care units was similar between agents (see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY and ADVERSE REACTIONS).. Cardiovascular Surgery. Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Surgery. Sevoflurane, USP was compared to isoflurane as an adjunct with opioids in multicenter study of 273 patients undergoing CABG surgery. Anesthesia was induced with midazolam (0.1-0.3 mg/kg); vecuronium (0.1-0.2 mg/kg), and fentanyl (5-15 mcg/kg). Both isoflurane and sevoflurane, USP were administered at loss of consciousness in doses of 1.0 MAC and titrated until the beginning of cardiopulmonary bypass to maximum of 2.0 MAC. The total dose of fentanyl did not exceed 25 mcg/kg. The average MAC dose was 0.49 for sevoflurane, USP and 0.53 for isoflurane. There were no significant differences in hemodynamics, cardioactive drug use, or ischemia incidence between the two groups. Outcome was also equivalent. In this small multicenter study, sevoflurane, USP appears to be as effective and as safe as isoflurane for supplementation of opioid anesthesia for coronary bypass grafting.. Non-Cardiac Surgery Patients at Risk for Myocardial Ischemia. Sevoflurane-N2O was compared to isoflurane-N2O for maintenance of anesthesia in multicenter study in 214 patients, age 40-87 years who were at mild-to-moderate risk for myocardial ischemia and were undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery. Forty-six percent (46%) of the operations were cardiovascular, with the remainder evenly divided between gastrointestinal and musculoskeletal and small numbers of other surgical procedures. The average duration of surgery was less than hours. Anesthesia induction usually was performed with thiopental (2-5 mg/kg) and fentanyl (1-5 mcg/kg). Vecuronium (0.1-0.2 mg/kg) was also administered to facilitate intubation, muscle relaxation or immobility during surgery. The average MAC dose was 0.49 for both anesthetics. There was no significant difference between the anesthetic regimens for intraoperative hemodynamics, cardioactive drug use, or ischemic incidents, although only 83 patients in the sevoflurane, USP group and 85 patients in the isoflurane group were successfully monitored for ischemia. The outcome was also equivalent in terms of adverse events, death, and postoperative myocardial infarction. Within the limits of this small multicenter study in patients at mild-to-moderate risk for myocardial ischemia, sevoflurane, USP was satisfactory equivalent to isoflurane in providing supplemental inhalation anesthesia to intravenous drugs.. Cesarean Section. Sevoflurane, USP (n=29) was compared to isoflurane (n=27) in ASA Class or II patients for the maintenance of anesthesia during cesarean section. Newborn evaluations and recovery events were recorded. With both anesthetics, Apgar scores averaged and at and minutes, respectively.Use of sevoflurane, USP as part of general anesthesia for elective cesarean section produced no untoward effects in mother or neonate. Sevoflurane, USP and isoflurane demonstrated equivalent recovery characteristics. There was no difference between sevoflurane, USP and isoflurane with regard to the effect on the newborn, as assessed by Apgar Score and Neurological and Adaptive Capacity Score (average=29.5). The safety of sevoflurane, USP in labor and vaginal delivery has not been evaluated.. Neurosurgery. Three studies compared sevoflurane, USP to isoflurane for maintenance of anesthesia during neurosurgical procedures. In study of 20 patients, there was no difference between sevoflurane, USP and isoflurane with regard to recovery from anesthesia. In studies, total of 22 patients with intracranial pressure (ICP) monitors received either sevoflurane, USP or isoflurane. There was no difference between sevoflurane, USP and isoflurane with regard to ICP response to inhalation of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 MAC inspired concentrations of volatile agent during N2O-O2-fentanyl anesthesia. During progressive hyperventilation from PaCO2 40 to PaCO2 30, ICP response to hypocarbia was preserved with sevoflurane, USP at both 0.5 and 1.0 MAC concentrations. In patients at risk for elevations of ICP, sevoflurane, USP should be administered cautiously in conjunction with ICP-reducing maneuvers such as hyperventilation.. Hepatic Impairment. multicenter study (2 sites) compared the safety of sevoflurane, USP and isoflurane in 16 patients with mild-to-moderate hepatic impairment utilizing the lidocaine MEGX assay for assessment of hepatocellular function. All patients received intravenous propofol (1-3 mg/kg) or thiopental (2-7 mg/kg) for induction and succinylcholine, vecuronium, or atracurium for intubation. Sevoflurane, USP or isoflurane was administered in either 100% O2 or up to 70% N2O/O2. Neither drug adversely affected hepatic function. No serum inorganic fluoride level exceeded 45 uM/L, but sevoflurane, USP patients had prolonged terminal disposition of fluoride, as evidenced by longer inorganic fluoride half-life than patients with normal hepatic function (23 hours vs. 10-48 hours).. Renal Impairment. Sevoflurane, USP was evaluated in renally impaired patients with baseline serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dL. Fourteen patients who received sevoflurane, USP were compared with 12 patients who received isoflurane. In another study, 21 patients who received sevoflurane, USP were compared with 20 patients who received enflurane. Creatinine levels increased in 7% of patients who received sevoflurane, USP, 8% of patients who received isoflurane, and 10% of patients who received enflurane. Because of the small number of patients with renal insufficiency (baseline serum creatinine greater than 1.5 mg/dL) studied, the safety of sevoflurane, USP administration in this group has not yet been fully established. Therefore, sevoflurane, USP should be used with caution in patients with renal insufficiency (see WARNINGS).

CLINICAL STUDIES SECTION.

Clinical Trials. Sevoflurane, USP was administered to total of 3185 patients. The types of patients are summarized as follows:Table 5: Patients Receiving Sevoflurane, USP in Clinical Trials Type of PatientsNumber StudiedADULT2223 Cesarean Delivery 29 Cardiovascular and patients at risk of myocardial ischemia246 Neurosurgical 22 Hepatic impairment Renal impairment 35PEDIATRIC962Clinical experience with these patients is described below.. Adult Anesthesia. The efficacy of sevoflurane, USP in comparison to isoflurane, enflurane, and propofol was investigated in outpatient and 25 inpatient studies involving 3591 adult patients. Sevoflurane, USP was found to be comparable to isoflurane, enflurane, and propofol for the maintenance of anesthesia in adult patients. Patients administered sevoflurane, USP showed shorter times (statistically significant) to some recovery events (extubation, response to command, and orientation) than patients who received isoflurane or propofol.. Mask Induction. Sevoflurane, USP has nonpungent odor and does not cause respiratory irritability. Sevoflurane, USP is suitable for mask induction in adults. In 196 patients, mask induction was smooth and rapid, with complications occurring with the following frequencies: cough, 6%; breathholding, 6%; agitation, 6%; laryngospasm, 5%.. Ambulatory Surgery. Sevoflurane, USP was compared to isoflurane and propofol for maintenance of anesthesia supplemented with N2O in two studies involving 786 adult (18-84 years of age) ASA Class I, II, or III patients. Shorter times to emergence and response to commands (statistically significant) were observed with sevoflurane, USP compared to isoflurane and propofol.Table 6: Recovery Parameters in Two Outpatient Surgery Studies: Least Squares Mean +- SEM Sevoflurane/N2OIsoflurane/N2OSevoflurane/N2OPropofol/N2OMeanMaintenanceAnesthesiaExposure +- SD0.64 +- 0.03 MACohr(n=245)0.66 +- 0.03 MACohr(n=249)0.8 +- 0.5 MACohr(n=166)7.3 +- 2.3 mg/kg/hr(n=166)Time to Emergence (min)8.2 +- 0.4(n=246)9.3 +- 0.3(n=251)8.3 +- 0.7(n=137)10.4 +- 0.7(n=142)Time to Respondto Commands(min)8.5 +- 0.4(n=246)9.8 +- 0.4(n=248)9.1 +- 0.7(n=139)11.5 +- 0.7(n=143)Time to FirstAnalgesia (min)45.9 +- 4.7(n=160)59.1 +- 6.0(n=252)46.1 +- 5.4(n=83)60.0 +- 4.7(n=88)Time toEligibility forDischarge fromRecovery Area (min)87.6 +- 5.3(n=244)79.1 +- 5.2(n=252)103.1 +- 3.8(n=139)105.1 +- 3.7(n=143)n number of patients with recording of recovery events.. Inpatient Surgery. Sevoflurane, USP was compared to isoflurane and propofol for maintenance of anesthesia supplemented with N2O in two multicenter studies involving 741 adult ASA Class I, II or III (18-92 years of age) patients. Shorter times to emergence, command response, and first post-anesthesia analgesia (statistically significant) were observed with sevoflurane, USP compared to isoflurane and propofol.Table 7: Recovery Parameters in Two Inpatient Surgery Studies: Least Squares Mean +- SEMSevoflurane/N2OIsoflurane/N2OSevoflurane/N2OPropofol/N2OMean Maintenance Anesthesia Exposure +- SD1.27 MACohr+- 0.05 (n=271)1.58 MACohr+- 0.06(n=282)1.43 MACohr+- 0.94(n=93)7.0 mg/kg/hr+- 2.9(n=92)Time to Emergence (min)11.0 +- 0.6(n=270)16.4 +- 0.6(n=281)8.8 +- 1.2(n=92)13.2 +- 1.2(n=92)Time to Respond to Commands (min)12.8 +- 0.7(n=270) 18.4 +- 0.7(n=281)11.0 +- 1.20 (n=92)14.4 +- 1.21(n=91)Time to First Analgesia (min)46.1 +- 3.0(n=233)55.4 +- 3.2(n=242)37.8 +- 3.3(n=82)49.2 +- 3.3(n=79)Time to Eligibility for Discharge from Recovery Area (min)139.2 +- 15.6(n=268)165.9 +- 16.3(n=282)148.4 +- 8.9(n=92)141.4 +- 8.9(n=92)n number of patients with recording of recovery events.. Pediatric Anesthesia. The concentration of sevoflurane, USP required for maintenance of general anesthesia is age-dependent (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION). Sevoflurane, USP or halothane was used to anesthetize 1620 pediatric patients aged day to 18 years, and ASA physical status or II (948 sevoflurane, USP, 672 halothane). In one study involving 90 infants and children, there were no clinically significant decreases in heart rate compared to awake values at MAC. Systolic blood pressure decreased 15-20% in comparison to awake values following administration of MAC sevoflurane, USP; however, clinically significant hypotension requiring immediate intervention did not occur. Overall incidences of bradycardia [more than 20 beats/min lower than normal (80 beats/min)] in comparative studies was 3% for sevoflurane, USP and 7% for halothane. Patients who received sevoflurane, USP had slightly faster emergence times (12 vs. 19 minutes), and higher incidence of post-anesthesia agitation (14% vs. 10%).Sevoflurane, USP (n=91) was compared to halothane (n=89) in single-center study for elective repair or palliation of congenital heart disease. The patients ranged in age from days to 11.8 years with an ASA physical status of II, III, and IV (18%, 68%, and 13% respectively). No significant differences were demonstrated between treatment groups with respect to the primary outcome measures: cardiovascular decompensation and severe arterial desaturation. Adverse event data was limited to the study outcome variables collected during surgery and before institution of cardiopulmonary bypass.. Mask Induction. Sevoflurane, USP has nonpungent odor and is suitable for mask induction in pediatric patients. In controlled pediatric studies in which mask induction was performed, the incidence of induction events is shown below (see ADVERSE REACTIONS).Table 8: Incidence of Pediatric Induction Events Sevoflurane (n=836)Halothane (n=660)Agitation14%11%Cough6%10%Breathholding5%6%Secretions3%3%Laryngospasm2%2%Bronchospasm<1%0%n number of patients.. Ambulatory Surgery. Sevoflurane, USP (n=518) was compared to halothane (n=382) for the maintenance of anesthesia in pediatric outpatients. All patients received N2O and many received fentanyl, midazolam, bupivacaine, or lidocaine. The time to eligibility for discharge from post-anesthesia care units was similar between agents (see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY and ADVERSE REACTIONS).. Cardiovascular Surgery. Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Surgery. Sevoflurane, USP was compared to isoflurane as an adjunct with opioids in multicenter study of 273 patients undergoing CABG surgery. Anesthesia was induced with midazolam (0.1-0.3 mg/kg); vecuronium (0.1-0.2 mg/kg), and fentanyl (5-15 mcg/kg). Both isoflurane and sevoflurane, USP were administered at loss of consciousness in doses of 1.0 MAC and titrated until the beginning of cardiopulmonary bypass to maximum of 2.0 MAC. The total dose of fentanyl did not exceed 25 mcg/kg. The average MAC dose was 0.49 for sevoflurane, USP and 0.53 for isoflurane. There were no significant differences in hemodynamics, cardioactive drug use, or ischemia incidence between the two groups. Outcome was also equivalent. In this small multicenter study, sevoflurane, USP appears to be as effective and as safe as isoflurane for supplementation of opioid anesthesia for coronary bypass grafting.. Non-Cardiac Surgery Patients at Risk for Myocardial Ischemia. Sevoflurane-N2O was compared to isoflurane-N2O for maintenance of anesthesia in multicenter study in 214 patients, age 40-87 years who were at mild-to-moderate risk for myocardial ischemia and were undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery. Forty-six percent (46%) of the operations were cardiovascular, with the remainder evenly divided between gastrointestinal and musculoskeletal and small numbers of other surgical procedures. The average duration of surgery was less than hours. Anesthesia induction usually was performed with thiopental (2-5 mg/kg) and fentanyl (1-5 mcg/kg). Vecuronium (0.1-0.2 mg/kg) was also administered to facilitate intubation, muscle relaxation or immobility during surgery. The average MAC dose was 0.49 for both anesthetics. There was no significant difference between the anesthetic regimens for intraoperative hemodynamics, cardioactive drug use, or ischemic incidents, although only 83 patients in the sevoflurane, USP group and 85 patients in the isoflurane group were successfully monitored for ischemia. The outcome was also equivalent in terms of adverse events, death, and postoperative myocardial infarction. Within the limits of this small multicenter study in patients at mild-to-moderate risk for myocardial ischemia, sevoflurane, USP was satisfactory equivalent to isoflurane in providing supplemental inhalation anesthesia to intravenous drugs.. Cesarean Section. Sevoflurane, USP (n=29) was compared to isoflurane (n=27) in ASA Class or II patients for the maintenance of anesthesia during cesarean section. Newborn evaluations and recovery events were recorded. With both anesthetics, Apgar scores averaged and at and minutes, respectively.Use of sevoflurane, USP as part of general anesthesia for elective cesarean section produced no untoward effects in mother or neonate. Sevoflurane, USP and isoflurane demonstrated equivalent recovery characteristics. There was no difference between sevoflurane, USP and isoflurane with regard to the effect on the newborn, as assessed by Apgar Score and Neurological and Adaptive Capacity Score (average=29.5). The safety of sevoflurane, USP in labor and vaginal delivery has not been evaluated.. Neurosurgery. Three studies compared sevoflurane, USP to isoflurane for maintenance of anesthesia during neurosurgical procedures. In study of 20 patients, there was no difference between sevoflurane, USP and isoflurane with regard to recovery from anesthesia. In studies, total of 22 patients with intracranial pressure (ICP) monitors received either sevoflurane, USP or isoflurane. There was no difference between sevoflurane, USP and isoflurane with regard to ICP response to inhalation of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 MAC inspired concentrations of volatile agent during N2O-O2-fentanyl anesthesia. During progressive hyperventilation from PaCO2 40 to PaCO2 30, ICP response to hypocarbia was preserved with sevoflurane, USP at both 0.5 and 1.0 MAC concentrations. In patients at risk for elevations of ICP, sevoflurane, USP should be administered cautiously in conjunction with ICP-reducing maneuvers such as hyperventilation.. Hepatic Impairment. multicenter study (2 sites) compared the safety of sevoflurane, USP and isoflurane in 16 patients with mild-to-moderate hepatic impairment utilizing the lidocaine MEGX assay for assessment of hepatocellular function. All patients received intravenous propofol (1-3 mg/kg) or thiopental (2-7 mg/kg) for induction and succinylcholine, vecuronium, or atracurium for intubation. Sevoflurane, USP or isoflurane was administered in either 100% O2 or up to 70% N2O/O2. Neither drug adversely affected hepatic function. No serum inorganic fluoride level exceeded 45 uM/L, but sevoflurane, USP patients had prolonged terminal disposition of fluoride, as evidenced by longer inorganic fluoride half-life than patients with normal hepatic function (23 hours vs. 10-48 hours).. Renal Impairment. Sevoflurane, USP was evaluated in renally impaired patients with baseline serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dL. Fourteen patients who received sevoflurane, USP were compared with 12 patients who received isoflurane. In another study, 21 patients who received sevoflurane, USP were compared with 20 patients who received enflurane. Creatinine levels increased in 7% of patients who received sevoflurane, USP, 8% of patients who received isoflurane, and 10% of patients who received enflurane. Because of the small number of patients with renal insufficiency (baseline serum creatinine greater than 1.5 mg/dL) studied, the safety of sevoflurane, USP administration in this group has not yet been fully established. Therefore, sevoflurane, USP should be used with caution in patients with renal insufficiency (see WARNINGS).

DESCRIPTION SECTION.

DESCRIPTION. Sevoflurane, USP, volatile liquid for inhalation, nonflammable and nonexplosive liquid administered by vaporization, is halogenated general inhalation anesthetic drug. Sevoflurane, USP is fluoromethyl 2,2,2,-trifluoro-1-(trifluoromethyl) ethyl ether and its structural formula is:Sevoflurane, USP, Physical Constants are:Molecular weight200.05Boiling point at 760 mm Hg58.6CSpecific gravity at 20C1.520 1.525Vapor pressure in mm Hg157 mm Hg at 20C197 mm Hg at 25C317 mm Hg at 36CDistribution Partition Coefficients at 37C:Blood/Gas0.63 0.69Water/Gas0.36Olive Oil/Gas47 54Brain/Gas1.15Mean Component/Gas Partition Coefficients at 25C for Polymers Used Commonly in Medical Applications:Conductive rubber14.0Butyl rubber7.7Polyvinylchloride17.4Polyethylene1.3Sevoflurane, USP is nonflammable and nonexplosive as defined by the requirements of International Electrotechnical Commission 601-2-13.Sevoflurane, USP is clear, colorless, liquid containing no additives. Sevoflurane, USP is not corrosive to stainless steel, brass, aluminum, nickel-plated brass, chrome-plated brass or copper beryllium. Sevoflurane, USP is nonpungent. It is miscible with ethanol, ether, chloroform, and benzene, and it is slightly soluble in water. Sevoflurane, USP is stable when stored under normal room lighting conditions according to instructions. No discernible degradation of sevoflurane, USP occurs in the presence of strong acids or heat. When in contact with alkaline CO2 absorbents (e.g. Baralyme and to lesser extent soda lime) within the anesthesia machine, Sevoflurane, USP can undergo degradation under certain conditions. Degradation of sevoflurane, USP is minimal, and degradants are either undetectable or present in non-toxic amounts when used as directed with fresh absorbents. Sevoflurane, USP degradation and subsequent degradant formation are enhanced by increasing absorbent temperature increased sevoflurane, USP concentration, decreased fresh gas flow and desiccated CO2 absorbents (especially with potassium hydroxide containing absorbents e.g. Baralyme).Sevoflurane, USP alkaline degradation occurs by two pathways. The first results from the loss of hydrogen fluoride with the formation of pentafluoroisopropenyl fluoromethyl ether, (PIFE, C4H2F6O), also known as Compound A, and trace amounts of pentafluoromethoxy isopropyl fluoromethyl ether, (PMFE, C5H6F6O), also known as Compound B. The second pathway for degradation of sevoflurane, USP, which occurs primarily in the presence of desiccated CO2 absorbents, is discussed later.In the first pathway, the defluorination pathway, the production of degradants in the anesthesia circuit results from the extraction of the acidic proton in the presence of strong base (KOH and/or NaOH) forming an alkene (Compound A) from sevoflurane, USP similar to formation of 2-bromo-2-chloro-1,1-difluoro ethylene (BCDFE) from halothane. Laboratory simulations have shown that the concentration of these degradants is inversely correlated with the fresh gas flow rate (See Figure 1).Since the reaction of carbon dioxide with absorbents is exothermic, the temperature increase will be determined by quantities of CO2 absorbed, which in turn will depend on fresh gas flow in the anesthesia circle system, metabolic status of the patient, and ventilation. The relationship of temperature produced by varying levels of CO2 and Compound production is illustrated in the following in vitro simulation where CO2 was added to circle absorber system.Compound concentration in circle absorber system increases as function of increasing CO2 absorbent temperature and composition (Baralyme producing higher levels than soda lime), increased body temperature, and increased minute ventilation, and decreasing fresh gas flow rates. It has been reported that the concentration of Compound increases significantly with prolonged dehydration of Baralyme. Compound exposure in patients also has been shown to rise with increased sevoflurane, USP concentrations and duration of anesthesia. In clinical study in which sevoflurane, USP was administered to patients under low flow conditions for >=2 hours at flow rates of Liter/minute, Compound levels were measured in an effort to determine the relationship between MAC hours and Compound levels produced. The relationship between Compound levels and sevoflurane, USP exposure are shown in Figure 2a.Compound has been shown to be nephrotoxic in rats after exposures that have varied in duration from one to three hours. No histopathologic change was seen at concentration of up to 270 ppm for one hour. Sporadic single cell necrosis of proximal tubule cells has been reported at concentration of 114 ppm after 3-hour exposure to Compound in rats. The LC50 reported at hour is 1050-1090 ppm (male-female) and, at hours, 350-490 ppm (male-female).An experiment was performed comparing sevoflurane, USP plus 75 or 100 ppm Compound with an active control to evaluate the potential nephrotoxicity of Compound in non-human primates. single 8-hour exposure of Sevoflurane, USP in the presence of Compound produced single-cell renal tubular degeneration and single-cell necrosis in cynomolgus monkeys. These changes are consistent with the increased urinary protein, glucose level and enzymic activity noted on days one and three on the clinical pathology evaluation. This nephrotoxicity produced by Compound is dose and duration of exposure dependent.At fresh gas flow rate of L/min, mean maximum concentrations of Compound in the anesthesia circuit in clinical settings are approximately 20 ppm (0.002%) with soda lime and 30 ppm (0.003%) with Baralyme in adult patients; mean maximum concentrations in pediatric patients with soda lime are about half those found in adults. The highest concentration observed in single patient with Baralyme was 61 ppm (0.0061%) and 32 ppm (0.0032%) with soda lime. The levels of Compound at which toxicity occurs in humans is not known.The second pathway for degradation of sevoflurane, USP occurs primarily in the presence of desiccated CO2 absorbents and leads to the dissociation of sevoflurane, USP into hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP) and formaldehyde. HFIP is inactive, non-genotoxic, rapidly glucuronidated and cleared by the liver. Formaldehyde is present during normal metabolic processes. Upon exposure to highly desiccated absorbent, formaldehyde can further degrade into methanol and formate. Formate can contribute to the formation of carbon monoxide in the presence of high temperature that can be associated with desiccated Baralyme. Methanol can react with Compound to form the methoxy addition product Compound B. Compound can undergo further HF elimination to form Compounds C, D, and E.Sevoflurane, USP degradants were observed in the respiratory circuit of an experimental anesthesia machine using desiccated CO2 absorbents and maximum sevoflurane, USP concentrations (8%) for extended periods of time (2 hours). Concentrations of formaldehyde observed with desiccated soda lime in this experimental anesthesia respiratory circuit were consistent with levels that could potentially result in respiratory irritation. Although KOH containing CO2 absorbents are no longer commercially available, in the laboratory experiments, exposure of sevoflurane, USP to the desiccated KOH containing CO2 absorbent, Baralyme, resulted in the detection of substantially greater degradant levels.. Sevoflurane Structural Formula. Figure - Fresh Gas Flow Rate versus Compound Levels in Circle Absorber System. Figure - Carbon Dioxide Flow Versus Compound and Maximum Temperature. Figure 2a ppm hr versus MAC hr at flow Rate of L/min.

PHARMACODYNAMICS SECTION.

Pharmacodynamics. Changes in the depth of sevoflurane, USP anesthesia rapidly follow changes in the inspired concentration.In the sevoflurane, USP clinical program, the following recovery variables were evaluated:1.Time to events measured from the end of study drug:oTime to removal of the endotracheal tube (extubation time)oTime required for the patient to open his/her eyes on verbal command (emergence time)oTime to respond to simple command (e.g., squeeze my hand) or demonstrates purposeful movement (response to command time, orientation time)2.Recovery of cognitive function and motor coordination was evaluated based on:opsychomotor performance tests (Digit Symbol Substitution Test [DSST], Treiger Dot Test)othe results of subjective (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) and objective (objective pain-discomfort scale [OPDS]) measurementsotime to administration of the first post-anesthesia analgesic medicationoassessments of post-anesthesia patient status3.Other recovery times were:otime to achieve an Aldrete Score of >=8otime required for the patient to be eligible for discharge from the recovery area, per standard criteria at siteotime when the patient was eligible for discharge from the hospitalotime when the patient was able to sit up or stand without dizzinessSome of these variables are summarized as follows:Table 2: Induction and Recovery Variables for Evaluable Pediatric Patients in Two Comparative Studies: Sevoflurane versus Halothane Time to End-Point (min)Sevoflurane Mean +- SEMHalothane Mean +- SEMInduction2.0 +- 0.2 (n=294)2.7 +- 0.2 (n=252)Emergence11.3 +- 0.7 (n=293)15.8 +- 0.8 (n=252)Response to command13.7 +- 1.0 (n=271)19.3 +- 1.1 (n=230)First analgesia52.2 +- 8.5 (n=216)67.6 +- 10.6 (n=150)Eligible for recovery discharge76.5 +- 2.0 (n=292)81.1 +- 1.9 (n=246)n number of patients with recording of events.Table 3: Recovery Variables for Evaluable Adult Patients in Two Comparative Studies: Sevoflurane versus Isoflurane Time to Parameter: (min)Sevoflurane Mean +- SEMIsoflurane Mean +- SEMEmergence7.7 +- 0.3 (n=395)9.1 +- 0.3 (n=348)Response to command8.1 +- 0.3 (n=395)9.7 +- 0.3 (n=345)First analgesia42.7 +- 3.0 (n=269)52.9 +- 4.2 (n=228)Eligible for recovery discharge87.6 +- 5.3 (n=244)79.1 +- 5.2 (n=252)n number of patients with recording of recovery events.Table 4: Meta-Analyses for Induction and Emergence Variables for Evaluable Adult Patients in Comparative Studies: Sevoflurane versus Propofol ParameterNo. of StudiesSevofluraneMean +- SEMPropofolMean +- SEMMean maintenance anesthesia exposure31.0 MACohr +- 0.8 (n=259)7.2 mg/kg/hr +- 2.6 (n=258)Time to induction: (min)13.1 +- 0.18 (n=93)2.2 +- 0.18 (n=93)Time to emergence: (min)38.6 +- 0.57 (n=255)11.0 +- 0.57 (n=260)Time to respond to command: (min)39.9 +- 0.60 (n=257)12.1 +- 0.60 (n=260)Time to first analgesia: (min)343.8 +- 3.79 (n=177)57.9 +- 3.68 (n=179)Time to eligibility for recovery discharge: (min)3116.0 +- 4.15 (n=257)115.6 +- 3.98 (n=261)n number of patients with recording of events.. 1.Time to events measured from the end of study drug:oTime to removal of the endotracheal tube (extubation time)oTime required for the patient to open his/her eyes on verbal command (emergence time)oTime to respond to simple command (e.g., squeeze my hand) or demonstrates purposeful movement (response to command time, orientation time). oTime to removal of the endotracheal tube (extubation time). oTime required for the patient to open his/her eyes on verbal command (emergence time). oTime to respond to simple command (e.g., squeeze my hand) or demonstrates purposeful movement (response to command time, orientation time). 2.Recovery of cognitive function and motor coordination was evaluated based on:opsychomotor performance tests (Digit Symbol Substitution Test [DSST], Treiger Dot Test)othe results of subjective (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) and objective (objective pain-discomfort scale [OPDS]) measurementsotime to administration of the first post-anesthesia analgesic medicationoassessments of post-anesthesia patient status. opsychomotor performance tests (Digit Symbol Substitution Test [DSST], Treiger Dot Test). othe results of subjective (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) and objective (objective pain-discomfort scale [OPDS]) measurements. otime to administration of the first post-anesthesia analgesic medication. oassessments of post-anesthesia patient status. 3.Other recovery times were:otime to achieve an Aldrete Score of >=8otime required for the patient to be eligible for discharge from the recovery area, per standard criteria at siteotime when the patient was eligible for discharge from the hospitalotime when the patient was able to sit up or stand without dizziness. otime to achieve an Aldrete Score of >=8. otime required for the patient to be eligible for discharge from the recovery area, per standard criteria at site. otime when the patient was eligible for discharge from the hospital. otime when the patient was able to sit up or stand without dizziness. Cardiovascular Effects. Sevoflurane, USP was studied in 14 healthy volunteers (18-35 years old) comparing sevoflurane-O2(Sevo/O2) to sevoflurane-N2O/O2 (Sevo/N2O/O2) during hours of anesthesia. During controlled ventilation, hemodynamic parameters measured are shown in Figures 7-10:Sevoflurane, USP is dose-related cardiac depressant. Sevoflurane, USP does not produce increases in heart rate at doses less than MAC.A study investigating the epinephrine induced arrhythmogenic effect of sevoflurane, USP versus isoflurane in adult patients undergoing transsphenoidal hypophysectomy demonstrated that the threshold dose of epinephrine (i.e., the dose at which the first sign of arrhythmia was observed) producing multiple ventricular arrhythmias was mcg/kg with both sevoflurane, USP and isoflurane. Consequently, the interaction of sevoflurane, USP with epinephrine appears to be equal to that seen with isoflurane.. Figure - Heart Rate. Figure - Mean Arterial Pressure. Figure - Systemic Vascular Resistance. Figure 10: Cardiac Index.

PRECAUTIONS SECTION.

PRECAUTIONS. During the maintenance of anesthesia, increasing the concentration of sevoflurane, USP produces dose-dependent decreases in blood pressure. Due to sevoflurane, USPs insolubility in blood, these hemodynamic changes may occur more rapidly than with other volatile anesthetics. Excessive decreases in blood pressure or respiratory depression may be related to depth of anesthesia and may be corrected by decreasing the inspired concentration of sevoflurane, USP.Rare cases of seizures have been reported in association with sevoflurane, USP use (see PRECAUTIONS Pediatric Use and ADVERSE REACTIONS).The recovery from general anesthesia should be assessed carefully before patient is discharged from the post-anesthesia care unit.. Information for Patients Effect of anesthetic and sedation drugs on early brain development. Studies conducted in young animals and children suggest repeated or prolonged use of general anesthetic or sedation drugs in children younger than years may have negative effects on their developing brains. Discuss with parents and caregivers the benefits, risks, and timing and duration of surgery or procedures requiring anesthetic and sedation drugs (see WARNINGS Pediatric Neurotoxicity).. Drug Interactions In clinical trials, no significant adverse reactions occurred with other drugs commonly used in the perioperative period, including: central nervous system depressants, autonomic drugs, skeletal muscle relaxants, anti-infective agents, hormones and synthetic substitutes, blood derivatives, and cardiovascular drugs.. Intravenous Anesthetics. Sevoflurane, USP administration is compatible with barbiturates, propofol, and other commonly used intravenous anesthetics.. Benzodiazepines and Opioids. Benzodiazepines and opioids would be expected to decrease the MAC of sevoflurane, USP in the same manner as with other inhalational anesthetics. Sevoflurane, USP administration is compatible with benzodiazepines and opioids as commonly used in surgical practice.. Nitrous Oxide. As with other halogenated volatile anesthetics, the anesthetic requirement for sevoflurane, USP is decreased when administered in combination with nitrous oxide. Using 50% N2O, the MAC equivalent dose requirement is reduced approximately 50% in adults, and approximately 25% in pediatric patients (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).. Neuromuscular Blocking Agents. As is the case with other volatile anesthetics, sevoflurane, USP increases both the intensity and duration of neuromuscular blockade induced by nondepolarizing muscle relaxants. When used to supplement alfentanil-N2O anesthesia, sevoflurane, USP and isoflurane equally potentiate neuromuscular block induced with pancuronium, vecuronium or atracurium. Therefore, during sevoflurane, USP anesthesia, the dosage adjustments for these muscle relaxants are similar to those required with isoflurane.Potentiation of neuromuscular blocking agents requires equilibration of muscle with delivered partial pressure of sevoflurane, USP. Reduced doses of neuromuscular blocking agents during induction of anesthesia may result in delayed onset of conditions suitable for endotracheal intubation or inadequate muscle relaxation.Among available nondepolarizing agents, only vecuronium, pancuronium and atracurium interactions have been studied during sevoflurane, USP anesthesia. In the absence of specific guidelines:1.For endotracheal intubation, do not reduce the dose of nondepolarizing muscle relaxants.2.During maintenance of anesthesia, the required dose of nondepolarizing muscle relaxants is likely to be reduced compared to that during N2O/opioid anesthesia. Administration of supplemental doses of muscle relaxants should be guided by the response to nerve stimulation.The effect of sevoflurane, USP on the duration of depolarizing neuromuscular blockade induced by succinylcholine has not been studied.. 1.For endotracheal intubation, do not reduce the dose of nondepolarizing muscle relaxants.. 2.During maintenance of anesthesia, the required dose of nondepolarizing muscle relaxants is likely to be reduced compared to that during N2O/opioid anesthesia. Administration of supplemental doses of muscle relaxants should be guided by the response to nerve stimulation.. Hepatic Function. Results of evaluations of laboratory parameters (e.g., ALT, AST, alkaline phosphatase, and total bilirubin, etc.), as well as investigator-reported incidence of adverse events relating to liver function, demonstrate that sevoflurane, USP can be administered to patients with normal or mild-to-moderately impaired hepatic function. However, patients with severe hepatic dysfunction were not investigated.Occasional cases of transient changes in postoperative hepatic function tests were reported with both sevoflurane, USP and reference agents. Sevoflurane, USP was found to be comparable to isoflurane with regard to these changes in hepatic function.Very rare cases of mild, moderate and severe post-operative hepatic dysfunction or hepatitis with or without jaundice have been reported from postmarketing experiences. Clinical judgement should be exercised when sevoflurane, USP is used in patients with underlying hepatic conditions or under treatment with drugs known to cause hepatic dysfunction (see ADVERSE REACTIONS).It has been reported that previous exposure to halogenated hydrocarbon anesthetics may increase the potential for hepatic injury.. Desiccated CO2 Absorbents. An exothermic reaction occurs when sevoflurane, USP is exposed to CO2 absorbents. This reaction is increased when the CO2 absorbent becomes desiccated, such as after an extended period of dry gas flow through the CO2 absorbent canisters. Rare cases of extreme heat, smoke, and/or spontaneous fire in the anesthesia breathing circuit have been reported during sevoflurane, USP use in conjunction with the use of desiccated CO2 absorbent, specifically those containing potassium hydroxide (e.g. Baralyme). KOH containing CO2 absorbents are not recommended for use with sevoflurane, USP. An unusually delayed rise or unexpected decline of inspired sevoflurane, USP concentration compared to the vaporizer setting may be associated with excessive heating of the CO2 absorbent and chemical breakdown of sevoflurane, USP.As with other inhalational anesthetics, degradation and production of degradation products can occur when sevoflurane, USP is exposed to desiccated absorbents. When clinician suspects that the CO2 absorbent may be desiccated, it should be replaced. The color indicator of most CO2 absorbents may not change upon desiccation. Therefore, the lack of significant color change should not be taken as an assurance of adequate hydration. CO2 absorbents should be replaced routinely regardless of the state of the color indicator.. Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility. CarcinogenesisStudies on carcinogenesis have not been performed for either sevoflurane, USP or Compound A. MutagenesisNo mutagenic effect of sevoflurane, USP was noted in the Ames test, mouse micronucleus test, mouse lymphoma mutagenicity assay, human lymphocyte culture assay, mammalian cell transformation assay, 32P DNA adduct assay, and no chromosomal aberrations were induced in cultured mammalian cells.Similarly, no mutagenic effect of Compound was noted in the Ames test, the Chinese hamster chromosomal aberration assay and the in vivo mouse micronucleus assay. However, positive responses were observed in the human lymphocyte chromosome aberration assay. These responses were seen only at high concentrations and in the absence of metabolic activation (human S-9).Impairment of FertilityIn study in which male rats were treated with sevoflurane (0.22%, 0.66%, 1.1%, or 2.2% equals 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, or 1.0 MAC) three hours per day every other day starting 64 days prior to mating and female rats were treated with the same dosing regimen 14 days prior to mating until Gestation Day 7, there was no clear impact on male or female fertility.. Pregnancy. Risk Summary There are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women.In animal reproduction studies, reduced fetal weights were noted following exposure to MAC sevoflurane for three hours day during organogenesis. Developmental and reproductive toxicity studies of sevoflurane in animals in the presence of strong alkalies (i.e., degradation of sevoflurane and production of Compound A) have not been conducted. Published studies in pregnant primates demonstrate that the administration of anesthetic and sedation drugs that block NMDA receptors and/or potentiate GABA activity during the period of peak brain development increases neuronal apoptosis in the developing brain of the offspring when used for longer than hours. There are no data on pregnancy exposures in primates corresponding to periods prior to the third trimester in humans. The estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage for the indicated population is unknown. All pregnancies have background risk of birth defect, loss, or other adverse outcomes. In the U.S. general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies is 2-4% and 15-20%, respectively.Data Animal Data Pregnant rats were treated with sevoflurane, USP (0.22%, 0.66%, or 2.2% equals 0.1, 0.3, or 1.0 MAC) without CO2 absorbent for three hours per day during organogenesis (from Gestation Day to 17). Fetuses obtained by Cesarean section were examined on Gestation Day 20 while some animals were maintained for littering and pups were examined for adverse effects. There were no adverse effects on fetuses at 0.3 MAC. Reduced fetal body weights and increased skeletal variations such as delayed ossifications in the presence of maternal toxicity (reduced food and water intake and body weight of the dams) were noted at MAC. In dams allowed to litter, reduced pup bodyweight gain and evidence of developmental delays (slight delay in eyelid opening and increased incidence of nonreactive animals in the visual placing reflex test) were noted in the 1.0 MAC treatment group. Pregnant rabbits were treated with sevoflurane, USP (0.1, 0.3, or 1.0 MAC) without CO2 absorbent for three hours per day during organogenesis (from Gestation Day to 18). There were no adverse effects on the fetus at any dose; the mid-and high-dose produced 5% and 6% decrease in maternal body weight, respectively. In another study, pregnant rats were administered sevoflurane (0.1, 0.3, or 1.0 MAC) from Gestation Day 17 to Postnatal Day 21. Pup body weights were reduced in the 1.0 MAC treatment group in the absence of maternal toxicity. There was no effect of sevoflurane, USP on sensory function (visual, auditory, nociception, righting reflexes), motor (roto-rod), open field test, or learning tasks (shuttle box avoidance and water T-maze). In published study in primates, administration of an anesthetic dose of ketamine for 24 hours on Gestation Day 122 increased neuronal apoptosis in the developing brain of the fetus. In other published studies, administration of either isoflurane or propofol for hours on Gestation Day 120 resulted in increased neuronal and oligodendrocyte apoptosis in the developing brain of the offspring. With respect to brain development, this time period corresponds to the third trimester of gestation in the human. The clinical significance of these findings is not clear; however, studies in juvenile animals suggest neuroapoptosis correlates with long-term cognitive deficits (see WARNINGS -Pediatric Neurotoxicity, PRECAUTIONS -Pediatric Use, and ANIMAL TOXICOLOGY AND/OR PHARMACOLOGY).. Labor and Delivery. Sevoflurane, USP has been used as part of general anesthesia for elective cesarean section in 29 women. There were no untoward effects in mother or neonate. (See PHARMACODYNAMICS-Clinical Trials). The safety of sevoflurane, USP in labor and delivery has not been demonstrated.. Nursing Mothers. The concentrations of sevoflurane, USP in milk are probably of no clinical importance 24 hours after anesthesia. Because of rapid washout, sevoflurane, USP concentrations in milk are predicted to be below those found with many other volatile anesthetics.. Geriatric Use. MAC decreases with increasing age. The average concentration of sevoflurane, USP to achieve MAC in an 80 year old is approximately 50% of that required in 20 year old.. Pediatric Use. Induction and maintenance of general anesthesia with sevoflurane, USP have been established in controlled clinical trials in pediatric patients aged to 18 years (see PHARMACODYNAMICS Clinical Trials and ADVERSE REACTIONS). Sevoflurane, USP has nonpungent odor and is suitable for mask induction in pediatric patients.The concentration of sevoflurane, USP required for maintenance of general anesthesia is age dependent. When used in combination with nitrous oxide, the MAC equivalent dose of sevoflurane, USP should be reduced in pediatric patients. MAC in premature infants has not been determined. (See PRECAUTIONS Drug Interactions and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION for recommendations in pediatric patients day of age and older.)The use of sevoflurane, USP has been associated with seizures (see PRECAUTIONS and ADVERSE REACTIONS). The majority of these have occurred in children and young adults starting from months of age, most of whom had no predisposing risk factors. Clinical judgement should be exercised when using sevoflurane, USP in patients who may be at risk for seizures.Published juvenile animal studies demonstrate that the administration of anesthetic and sedation drugs, such as sevoflurane, USP, that either block NMDA receptors or potentiate the activity of GABA during the period of rapid brain growth or synaptogenesis, results in widespread neuronal and oligodendrocyte cell loss in the developing brain and alterations in synaptic morphology and neurogenesis. Based on comparisons across species, the window of vulnerability to these changes is believed to correlate with exposures in the third trimester of gestation through the first several months of life, but may extend out to approximately years of age in humans.In primates, exposure to hours of ketamine that produced light surgical plane of anesthesia did not increase neuronal cell loss; however, treatment regimens of hours or longer of isoflurane increased neuronal cell loss. Data from isoflurane-treated rodents and ketamine-treated primates suggest that the neuronal and oligodendrocyte cell losses are associated with prolonged cognitive deficits in learning and memory. The clinical significance of these nonclinical findings is not known, and healthcare providers should balance the benefits of appropriate anesthesia in pregnant women, neonates, and young children who require procedures with the potential risks suggested by the nonclinical data (see WARNINGS -Pediatric Neurotoxicity, PRECAUTIONS -Pregnancy, and ANIMAL TOXICOLOGY AND/OR PHARMACOLOGY).

WARNINGS SECTION.

WARNINGS. Although data from controlled clinical studies at low flow rates are limited, findings taken from patient and animal studies suggest that there is potential for renal injury which is presumed due to Compound A. Animal and human studies demonstrate that sevoflurane, USP administered for more than MACohours and at fresh gas flow rates of <2 L/min may be associated with proteinuria and glycosuria.While level of Compound exposure at which clinical nephrotoxicity might be expected to occur has not been established, it is prudent to consider all of the factors leading to Compound exposure in humans, especially duration of exposure, fresh gas flow rate, and concentration of sevoflurane, USP. During sevoflurane, USP anesthesia the clinician should adjust inspired concentration and fresh gas flow rate to minimize exposure to Compound A. To minimize exposure to Compound A, sevoflurane, USP exposure should not exceed MACohours at flow rates of to <2 L/min. Fresh gas flow rates <1 L/min are not recommended.Because clinical experience in administering sevoflurane, USP to patients with renal insufficiency (creatinine >1.5 mg/dL) is limited, its safety in these patients has not been established.Sevoflurane, USP may be associated with glycosuria and proteinuria when used for long procedures at low flow rates. The safety of low flow sevoflurane, USP on renal function was evaluated in patients with normal preoperative renal function. One study compared sevoflurane, USP (N=98) to an active control (N=90) administered for >=2 hours at fresh gas flow rate of <=1 Liter/minute. Per study defined criteria (Hou et al.) one patient in the sevoflurane, USP group developed elevations of creatinine, in addition to glycosuria and proteinuria. This patient received sevoflurane, USP at fresh gas flow rates of <=800 mL/minute. Using these same criteria, there were no patients in the active control group who developed treatment emergent elevations in serum creatinine.Sevoflurane, USP may present an increased risk in patients with known sensitivity to volatile halogenated anesthetic agents. KOH containing CO2 absorbents are not recommended for use with sevoflurane, USP.Reports of QT prolongation, associated with torsade de pointes (in exceptional cases, fatal), have been received. Caution should be exercised when administering sevoflurane to susceptible patients (e.g.patients with congenital Long QT Syndrome or patients taking drugs that can prolong the QT interval).. Malignant Hyperthermia. In susceptible individuals, potent inhalation anesthetic agents, including sevoflurane, USP, may trigger skeletal muscle hypermetabolic state leading to high oxygen demand and the clinical syndrome known as malignant hyperthermia. Sevoflurane can induce malignant hyperthermia in genetically susceptible individuals, such as those with certain inherited ryanodine receptor mutations. The clinical syndrome is signaled by hypercapnia, and may include muscle rigidity, tachycardia, tachypnea, cyanosis, arrhythmias, and/or unstable blood pressure. Some of these nonspecific signs may also appear during light anesthesia, acute hypoxia, hypercapnia, and hypovolemia. In clinical trials, one case of malignant hyperthermia was reported. In addition, there have been postmarketing reports of malignant hyperthermia. Some of these cases have been fatal. Treatment of malignant hyperthermia includes discontinuation of triggering agents (e.g., sevoflurane, USP), administration of intravenous dantrolene sodium (consult prescribing information for intravenous dantrolene sodium for additional information on patient management), and application of supportive therapy. Supportive therapy may include efforts to restore body temperature, respiratory and circulatory support as indicated, and management of electrolyte-fluid-acid-base abnormalities. Renal failure may appear later, and urine flow should be monitored and sustained if possible.. Perioperative Hyperkalemia. Use of inhaled anesthetic agents has been associated with rare increases in serum potassium levels that have resulted in cardiac arrhythmias and death in pediatric patients during the postoperative period. Patients with latent as well as overt neuromuscular disease, particularly Duchenne muscular dystrophy, appear to be most vulnerable. Concomitant use of succinylcholine has been associated with most, but not all, of these cases. These patients also experienced significant elevations in serum creatine kinase levels and, in some cases, changes in urine consistent with myoglobinuria. Despite the similarity in presentation to malignant hyperthermia, none of these patients exhibited signs or symptoms of muscle rigidity or hypermetabolic state. Early and aggressive intervention to treat the hyperkalemia and resistant arrhythmias is recommended; as is subsequent evaluation for latent neuromuscular disease.. Pediatric Neurotoxicity Published animal studies demonstrate that the administration of anesthetic and sedation drugs that block NMDA receptors and/or potentiate GABA activity increase neuronal apoptosis in the developing brain and result in long-term cognitive deficits when used for longer than hours. The clinical significance of these findings is not clear. However, based on the available data, the window of vulnerability to these changes is believed to correlate with exposures in the third trimester of gestation through the first several months of life, but may extend out to approximately three years of age in humans (see PRECAUTIONS -Pregnancy, PRECAUTIONS -Pediatric Use, and ANIMAL TOXICOLOGY AND/OR PHARMACOLOGY). Some published studies in children suggest that similar deficits may occur after repeated or prolonged exposures to anesthetic agents early in life and may result in adverse cognitive or behavioral effects. These studies have substantial limitations, and it is not clear if the observed effects are due to the anesthetic/sedation drug administration or other factors such as the surgery or underlying illness.Anesthetic and sedation drugs are necessary part of the care of children needing surgery, other procedures, or tests that cannot be delayed, and no specific medications have been shown to be safer than any other. Decisions regarding the timing of any elective procedures requiring anesthesia should take into consideration the benefits of the procedure weighed against the potential risks.